Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
Let us think of reasoning beings existing on the surface of an
egg-shaped body. Shortest lines could be drawn between three points of
such a surface and a triangle constructed. But if the attempt were made
to construct congruent triangles at different parts of the surface, it
would be found that two triangles, with three pairs of equal sides,
would not have their angles equal. The sum of the angles of a triangle
drawn at the sharper pole of the body would depart farther from two
right angles than if the triangle were drawn at the blunter pole or at
the equator. Hence it appears that not even such a simple figure as
a triangle can be moved on such a surface without change of form. It
would also be found that if circles of equal radii were constructed at
different parts of such a surface (the length of the radii being always
measured by shortest lines along the surface) the periphery would be
greater at the blunter than at the sharper end.
We see accordingly that, if a surface admits of the figures lying on it
being freely moved without change of any of their lines and angles as
measured along it, the property is a special one and does not belong to
every kind of surface. The condition under which a surface possesses
this important property was pointed out by Gauss in his celebrated
treatise on the curvature of surfaces.[3] The ‘measure of curvature,’
as he called it, _i.e._ the reciprocal of the product of the greatest
and least radii of curvature, must be everywhere equal over the whole
extent of the surface.
[Footnote 3: Gauss, _Werke_, Bd. IV. p. 215, first published in
_Commentationes Sec. Reg. Scientt. Gottengensis recentiores_, vol. vi.,
1828.]
Gauss showed at the same time that this measure of curvature is not
changed if the surface is bent without distension or contraction of any
part of it. Thus we can roll up a flat sheet of paper into the form
of a cylinder, or of a cone, without any change in the dimensions of
the figures taken along the surface of the sheet. Or the hemispherical
fundus of a bladder may be rolled into a spindle-shape without altering
the dimensions on the surface. Geometry on a plane will therefore be
the same as on a cylindrical surface; only in the latter case we must
imagine that any number of layers of this surface, like the layers of a
rolled sheet of paper, lie one upon another, and that after each entire
revolution round the cylinder a new layer is reached different from the
previous ones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account