Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Bryce states that the collection of revenues of a political Ring flow
from five sources, viz., public subscriptions, contributions from
contractors and others expecting favors, surreptitious appropriations
from the city or state treasury, assessments upon the office holders,
and sale of offices and nominations to office. Breen says truly in the
book already quoted that the majority of voters are utterly unaware of
what is really going on in the party. There are, he says, “scarcely
5,000 persons in the City of New York who are aware of the secret and
surreptitious methods governing the inside of politics or of the
subterranean channels thereto by which gross wrongs are perpetrated. The
secret combinations, conspiracies, deals and bribery are confined to the
expert politician.” How few, for instance, know the facts in relation to
the practice of the barter of high offices. One of the inevitable
results of the development of the present system is the sale of
nominations to public office negotiated by the boss for the benefit of
the machine. The existence of this traffic though secretly conducted is
well known in political circles. Sometimes the payment is direct;
sometimes it is disguised in the shape of contributions to campaign
funds made by the candidate or someone in his behalf.
“In the large cities, with New York at their head, practice
established a sort of tariff for each set of offices according to
the length of the term and the importance of the place. Thus a
judgeship, that is to say, the nomination to it amounted to
$15,000; a seat in Congress was rated at $4,000; for membership of
a state legislature $1,500 was demanded; a like amount for the
position of alderman in a city council, etc.” (Ostrogorski, _Idem_,
p. 70.)
“Candidates for the judiciary in New York City have paid Tammany
Hall $5,000 to $10,000 for their offices.” (_Commons on
Proportional Representation_, p. 303.)
Dr. Clark writing in 1900 says:
“By credible accounts as much as $100,000 has been paid to get
nominated by the Convention of the dominant party for Clerk,
Register or Sheriff of the County of New York; half that sum for
Treasurer of Pennsylvania, and, in proportion to their
opportunities for others the like offices all over the country. A
seat on the Supreme Judicial bench costs from $5,000 to $15,000. A
nomination to Congress from the lean pastures of Vermont or New
Hampshire can sometimes be had for a thousand dollars, but in the
golden fields of California and Nevada it has cost fifty thousand.”
(_The Machine Abolished_, p. 40.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account