Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Such are the fruits of manhood suffrage in the most enlightened country
in the world.
M. de Tocqueville, a distinguished Frenchman, who visited this country
in 1831, ten years after manhood suffrage had been widely established,
was struck by the vulgar aspect of the men whom he found in the House of
Representatives at Washington. He said: “They are for the most part
village lawyers, dealers or even men belonging to the lowest classes.”
No one would have said that of the Continental Congress nor of any
Congress before Jackson’s time.
The very latest observers give similar testimony. Mr. Godkin notes the
disappearance from Congress and from public life of the class of
statesmen and great political leaders of former days, such as Webster,
Clay, Calhoun, Silas Wright, Marcy and Seward, and ascribes it to the
political bosses who will tolerate no independence. Mr. Bryce says:
“The members of legislatures are not chosen for their ability or
experience, but are, five-sixths of them, little above the average
citizen. They are not much respected or trusted, and finding no
exceptional virtue expected from them, they behave as ordinary men
do when subjected to temptations.”
And again:
“It must be confessed that the legislative bodies of the United
States have done something to discredit representative government.”
(_American Commonwealth_, Vol. II, pp. 587, 609.)
Writing of Congress in 1907 Professor Commons says:
“Why is it that a legislative assembly which in our country’s
infancy summoned to its halls a Madison or a Hamilton to achieve
the liberties of the people has now fallen so low that our
public-spirited men hesitate to approach it?” (_Proportional
Representation_, p. 8.)
Professor Commons does not further attempt an answer to his own
question, but it is not difficult to find one. When an inferior choice
is made, the fault is always with the chooser. Congress is inferior
because the electorate is inferior, and because the manhood suffrage
machine insists on mediocrity and slavishness in Congress and everywhere
else and has lowered the political spirit of the nation. Writing about
1899 Professor Hyslop of Columbia University, New York, says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account