Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“Congressmen require considerable omniscience to fulfil their
responsibilities, but they possess very little of that
qualification, and too often no honesty, public spirit, or devotion
to the real interests of the country. Too poor to disregard the
salary attached to the office, they must consider their personal
interest to secure a re-election, which puts them at the mercy of
any unscrupulous man or men who may hold the balance of power in
their districts; and consequently the man who will follow the
‘boss’ or ‘work’ the proper portion of his constituents can get the
place and salary while the intelligent and conscientious man who
thinks less of the remuneration than of his duty to the public must
remain at home. The time servers, demagogues, and men with an
elastic conscience are the successful bidders for the offices and
salaries. They know how to use good sentiments and patriotism for
votes, the voters all the while running trustfully after the devil,
who is sure to draw them into the bottomless pit.” (_Democracy_, p.
172.)
This deterioration is observable in our public men generally.
“Sincere men no longer deny that the offices of trust and profit
are now filled, in the United States, with much more inferior men
than as compared with former periods; indeed, it is admitted that
if we want to find political conditions like unto ours, anywhere,
we have to search in the records of the worst phases of public
administration which history affords.” (Reemelin, _American
Politics_, p. 307.)
As late as the present year, 1919, Brooks Adams, in one of his writings,
refers to the undoubtable deterioration of the standard of our public
men as compared with the time of his grandfather, John Quincy Adams.
Ostrogorski writes that:
“The unreasoning discipline of party and the innumerable
concessions and humiliations through which it drags every aspirant
to a public post have enfeebled the will of men in politics, have
destroyed their courage and independence of mind, and almost
obliterated their dignity as human beings.” (_Democracy_, p. 389.)
Professor Reinsch alludes to this moral degradation in striking
language. Referring to the bosses, he says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account