Popular misgovernment in the United States — John Shaqi
Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“The present situation has been described over and over again.
Briefly, it is constant encroachments by the legislature upon the
executive; legislation under irresponsible ‘bosses’ for personal
ends, blackmailing of corporations by politicians, and of society
by corporations to recoup the plunder of the politician, or to
accumulate ill-gotten gain, both of them very good imitations of
the Spanish policy in the colonies which is terminating in the ruin
of an empire; favours shown to special forms of business and
industry; unjust taxation; the irresponsible conduct of our
legislatures whose deliberations are the signal for alarm and
confusion in the commercial world; and mass-meetings every week to
frighten politicians into submission, libel, bribery, and lying in
campaign work, government by perjurers, pugilists and pimps, and
political leadership by men who know no arts but those of
Alcibiades and Catiline--all these and a hundred other facts like
them create a profound and justifiable suspicion of institutions
that confer the supreme power upon those who are equally unfit to
govern themselves and others.” _Democracy_, Hyslop, p. 294.
Now, let us more carefully examine and consider the essential character
of the political system which has produced these unsatisfactory results.
Its basis is unlimited or unqualified suffrage, until recently appearing
and manifested as “manhood suffrage,” but now, since the so-called
“enfranchisement” of women more nearly fitting the name “universal
suffrage.” In any case in theory at least it is government by numbers,
in contradistinction to government by intelligence, birth, wealth,
experience, talent or by any combination of these or other qualities or
achievements. This doctrine of unlimited or unqualified suffrage is now
and has long been recognized as an established principle of government
in this country by most of us; indeed we may say by all Americans with
the exception of the natives or inhabitants of the Southern or former
slave States. By these latter pure manhood suffrage has been tried and
condemned and has been replaced by white manhood suffrage by means of
certain well known and successful political devices amounting
practically to a strict race qualification; though the important and
suggestive fact that thereby the basic principle of manhood suffrage was
expressly repudiated by the entire South has been carefully blinked by
Americans generally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account