Portuguese literatureBell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
History
Portuguese literature
Bell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
Portuguese literature -- History and criticism
The early Portuguese _Cancioneiros_ contain many references to
this cycle, and the _Cancioneiro Colocci-Brancuti_ opens with five
celebrated songs,[118] imitations of Breton _lais_, with rubrics
explaining their subjects, and mentioning King Arthur and Tristan,
Iseult, Cornwall, Maraot of Ireland, and Lancelot. Whether they were
incorporated in the _Cancioneiro_ from a Portuguese _Tristam_ earlier
than the Spanish version (1343?), or, as is more probable, directly
from the Old-French _Historia Tristani_, their presence here is a
sufficient witness to the Portuguese fondness for such themes. It was
but natural that a Celtic people living by the sea, delighting in
vague legends and in foreign novelties, should have felt drawn towards
these misty tales of love and wandering adventure, which carried
them west as far as Cornwall and Ireland, and also East, through the
search for the Holy Grail. It was natural that they should undergo
their influence earlier and more strongly than their more direct
and more national neighbours the Castilians, whose clear, definite
descriptions in the twelfth-century _Poema del Cid_ would send those
legends drifting back to the dim regions of their birth. (Even to-day
connexion with and sympathy for Ireland is far commoner in Galicia than
in any other part of Spain.) Unhappily, most of the early Portuguese
versions of the Breton legends have been lost. King Duarte in his
library possessed _Merlim_, _O Livro de Tristam_, and _O Livro de
Galaaz_. The probability that these were written in Portuguese, not in
Spanish, is increased by the survival of _A Historia dos Cavalleiros
da Mesa Redonda e da Demanda do Santo Graall_, as yet only partially
published from the manuscript (2594) in the Vienna _Hofbibliothek_.
It was written probably in the fourteenth century, perhaps at the end
of the thirteenth, although the Vienna manuscript is more recent and
belongs to the fifteenth century, in which the work was referred to
by the poet Rodriguez de la Cámara.[119] It is a Portuguese version
of the story of the Holy Grail, and, although not a continuous
translation, was evidently written with the French original (doubtfully
ascribed to Robert de Boron,[120] author of a different work on the
same subject) constantly in view. Traces of French remain in its
prose.[121] This was clearly part of a larger work,[122] perhaps of
a whole cycle of works dealing with the search for the Holy Grail.
The only others that we have in print are the _Estorea de Vespeseano_
and the _Livro de Josep ab Arimatia_, the manuscript of which was
discovered in the nineteenth century in the Torre do Tombo. This, in
the same way as the _Demanda do Santo Graall_, is a later (16th c.)
copy of a thirteenth-fourteenth-century Portuguese translation or
adaptation from the French, and retains in its language signs of French
origin. The incunable _Estorea de Vespeseano_ (Lixboa, 1496) is a work
in twenty-nine short chapters, which only incidentally[123] refers
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account