Postal service -- United States -- Second-class matter
Postmaster General Hitchcock represented his department before
the commission, Second Assistant Stewart and Third Assistant
Britt were also present, each in turn occupying the stand.
Hitchcock outlined his position concerning a demand for an
increase for the first time, although the same idea was
expressed by Third Assistant Britt some months ago, when Britt
made an address before a convention of newspaper circulation
managers in Chicago. Hitchcock and his two assistants held to
the view that each schedule in the postal service should be
made self-sustaining, the credit for this idea being given to
Hitchcock, and in order to justify his position concerning a
raise in second-class rates an arbitrary figure has been placed
on the cost of handling the same, the total “deficit” from this
schedule being placed at about $70,000,000 annually. This amount
was arrived at by what Second Assistant Postmaster General
Stewart states was a complete record of the weighing of all mail
handled by the Postoffice Department of matter originating in
every postoffice and railway postoffice in the country for a
period of six months from July 1 to December 1, 1907, together
with the amount of mail carried in every railway car. The
department in many instances has admitted the unreliability of
the figures used, there having been many estimates employed.
Publishers of the country were represented by several attorneys
who examined into the testimony given by Hitchcock, Stewart
and Britt, and by a series of questions they showed that the
conclusions of the three as to cost of handling second-class
mail were made on a guesswork plan and not on a scientific or
reasonably accurate basis of fact. Third Assistant Postmaster
General Britt made the startling statement that “if all the
magazines and newspapers were excluded from the second-class
rates because of a circulation gained, _not on the merits_ of
the publication, but _because of some voting contest or offer of
premiums as a bait, not 10 per cent. of the total would remain
undisturbed_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account