Postal service -- United States -- Second-class matter
Six years ago (1904-5), the substantial assets of the American
Express Company had grown from $5,300,000, the amount fixed in
the articles of association, to _six times that amount_. These
assets, let me repeat, did not represent new capital put into the
business, for _none whatever_ was put in, but were accumulations
of earnings over and above funds required to carry on the
business and pay dividends of 8% upon $18,000,000 of stock.
Even the association’s own shareholders failed to see the need
of such a treasure and in 1906 a committee representing them
addressed the officers of the company thus: “_It is evident the
management has faith in its ability to conserve the vast fund so
accumulated beyond the needs of the business, without wasting the
same or embarking it in new and dangerous ventures, and while
we personally neither criticise them nor express any want of
confidence in them, still it is our opinion, and that of many
representative holders of long standing, experience and means,
that this immense fund should not be further rapidly increased to
become a source of temptation to the possible weakness or a snare
to the possible inexperience of their successors._”
I would like to quote further from both Mr. Benson and Mr. Atwood. The
former writes two articles which appeared in Pearson’s Magazine in
February and March, 1911, clearly showing not only why we have no parcels
post, but, to some extent, the raid which the express companies have made
and are making on postal service revenues that rightfully and _legally_
should accrue to the government. The latter, Mr. Atwood, speaks in three
splendid articles in the American Magazine (February, March and April),
under the caption, “The Great Express Monopoly.” Each of the gentlemen
handles his subject masterfully. Each of them set forth facts which every
American citizen should know and, knowing, should _go after_ every public
official who has ignorantly permitted or knowingly condoned, aided or
cloaked the criminal raiding into the legitimate field of the postal
service and revenues. Every one who can should get hold of and read the
five articles referred to. I shall probably quote further from them in
the closing division of this volume, but to appreciate them fully one
should read them entire and connectedly.
Sufficient has here been said, however, to show any fair-minded reader
that our express companies, or the railways which use the express
companies merely as pinch-bars to pry into our postal revenues on the one
hand and as cloaks for excessive rates to the general public for handling
light or parcels freight on the other, are illegally taking _millions of
dollars annually_ for a service which should be, and which was originally
intended to be, rendered by the Postoffice Department.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account