[88] Without pretending to anything like a representative or an exhaustive statement in the case of this magazine literature, I may mention the following: Professor Perry of Harvard, in his valuable articles for the _Journal of Philosophy and Psychology_, 1907, vol. iv., upon “A Review of Pragmatism as a Philosophical Generalization,” and a “Review of Pragmatism as a Theory of Knowledge”; Professor Armstrong in vol. v. of the same journal upon the “Evolution of Pragmatism”; and Professor Lovejoy in the 1908 vol. upon the “Thirteen Pragmatisms.” These are but a few out of the many that might be mentioned. The reader who is interested in looking for more such must simply consult for himself the _Philosophical Review_, and _Mind_, and the _Journal of Philosophy and Psychology_, for some years after, say, 1903. There is a good list of such articles in a German Doctor Thesis by Professor MacEachran of the University of Alberta, entitled _Pragmatismus eine neue Richtung der Philosophie_, Leipzig, 1910. There is also a history of pragmatist articles in the 1907 (January) number of the _Revue des Sciences, Philosophiques et Theologiques._ [89] That this has really taken place can be clearly seen, I think, if we inspect the official programmes of the Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association for the last year or two. [90] P. 144. [91] See p. 149. [92] See Chapter VI., p. 149, upon the doctrine and the fact of “Meaning.” [93] Professor Pratt, _What is Pragmatism?_ (Macmillan & Co., 1909); H. H. Bawden, _The Principles of Pragmatism, a Philosophical Interpretation of Experience_, Boston, 1910 (a useful book presenting what may be called a “phenomenological” account of Pragmatism); Moore, _Pragmatism and Its Critics_. [94] _In Pragmatism and Its Critics_ (Univ. of Chicago Press). [95] The manifesto has now become a book. _The New Realism_ (Macmillan). For a useful account of the New Realism and the Old see Professor Perry, _Present Philosophical Tendencies_, Part V.