Prehistoric villages, castles, and towers of southwestern ColoradoFewkes, Jesse Walter
History
Prehistoric villages, castles, and towers of southwestern Colorado
Fewkes, Jesse Walter
Colorado -- Antiquities; Mesa Verde National Park (Colo.) -- Antiquities; Pueblo Indians -- Antiquities
Surouaro was one of the first ruins in this region described by
American explorers, attention having been first called to it by
Professor Newberry,[14] whose description follows: “Surouaro is the
name of a ruined town which must have once contained a population of
several thousands. The name is said to be of Indian (Utah) origin,
and to signify desolation, and certainly no better could have been
selected.... The houses are, many of them, large, and all built of
stone, hammer dressed on the exposed faces. Fragments of pottery are
exceedingly common, though like the buildings, showing great age....
The remains of _metates_ (corn mills) are abundant about the ruins. The
ruins of several large reservoirs, built of masonry, may be seen at
Surouaro, and there are traces of acequias which led to them, through
which water was brought, perhaps from a great distance.”
[13] In his valuable study, Pueblo Ruins of the Galisteo Basin, New
Mexico (Anthrop. Papers of the Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. XV, pt. 1,
1914), Mr. Nelson figures (Plan I, _B_) an embedded circular kiva in
what he calls the “historic part” of the Galisteo Ruin, but does not
state how he distinguishes the historic from the prehistoric part of
this building. The other kivas at Galisteo are few in number and not
embedded, but situated outside the house masses as in historic pueblos.
[14] Report of the exploring expedition from Santa Fe, New Mexico,
to the Junction of the Grand and Green Rivers of the Great Colorado
of the West in 1859, under the command of Capt. J. N. Macomb, p. 88,
Washington, 1876.
GOODMAN POINT RUIN
This ruin is a cluster of small mounds surrounding larger ones,
recalling the arrangement at Aztec Spring. They naturally fall into two
groups which from their direction or relation to the adjacent spring
may be called the south and north sections.
The most important mound of the south section, Block A, measures 74
feet on the north, 79 feet on the south, and 76 feet on the west side.
This large mound corresponds morphologically to the “Upper House” at
Aztec Spring (fig. 1, _A_). About it there are arranged at intervals,
mainly on the north and east sides, other smaller mounds generally
indicating rectangular buildings. The southeast angle of the largest
is connected by a low wall with one of the smaller mounds, forming
an enclosure called a court, whose northern border is the rim of
the canyon just above the spring. A determination of the detailed
architectural features of the building buried under Block A is not
possible, as none of its walls stand above the mass of fallen stones,
but it is evident, from circular depressions and fragments of straight
walls that appear over the surface of the mound, that the rooms were
of two kinds, rectangular forms, or dwellings, and circular chambers,
or kivas. This mound resembles Far View House on the Mesa Verde before
excavation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account