Prejudices, fifth seriesMencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
History
Prejudices, fifth series
Mencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
American essays -- 20th century; American literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
I observe of late a tendency to examine the English of Conrad rather
biliously. This folly is cultivated chiefly in England, where, I
suppose, chauvinistic motives enter into the matter. It is the just
boast of great empires that they draw in talents from near and far,
exhausting the little nations to augment their own puissance; it
is their misfortune that these talents often remain defectively
assimilated. Conrad remained the Slav to the end. The people of his
tales, whatever he calls them, are always as much Slavs as he is; the
language in which he describes them retains a sharp, exotic flavor.
But to say that this flavor constitutes a blemish is to say something
so preposterous that only schoolmasters and their dupes may be thought
of as giving it credit. The truly first-rate writer is not one who
uses the language as such dolts demand that it be used; he is one who
reworks it in spite of their prohibitions. It is his distinction that
he thinks in a manner different from the thinking of ordinary men;
that he is free from that slavery to embalmed ideas which makes them
so respectable and so dull. Obviously, he cannot translate his notions
into terms of everyday without doing violence to their inner integrity;
as well ask a Richard Strauss to funnel all his music into the
chaste jugs of Prof. Dr. Jadassohn. What Conrad brought into English
literature was a new concept of the relations between fact and fact,
idea and idea, and what he contributed to the complex and difficult art
of writing English was a new way of putting words together. His style
now amazes and irritates pedants because it does not roll along in the
old ruts. Well, it is precisely that rolling along in the old ruts that
he tried to avoid--and it was precisely that avoidance which made him
what he is. What lies under most of his alleged sins seems to me to be
simple enough: he views English logically and analytically, and not
through a haze of senseless traditions and arbitrary taboos. No Oxford
mincing is in him. If he cannot find his phrase above the salt, he
seeks it below. His English, in a word, is innocent. And if, at times,
there gets into it a color that is strange and even bizarre, then the
fact is something to rejoice over, for a living language is like a man
suffering incessantly from small internal hemorrhages, and what it
needs above all else is constant transfusions of new blood from other
tongues. The day the gates go up, that day it begins to die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account