Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
An examination of carved and painted specimens shows clearly that this
description of symbols is theoretical rather than rigidly normative,
for in many cases considerable freedom in their use may be observed.
An example of this kind is presented by the wolf masks used by the
Kwakiutl in the dance “Brought-Down-From-Above”[111] (fig. 198). Most
of these have the slanting eye and pointed ears. In one specimen,
however, the ear is pointed forward. The snout slants backward, the
nose is high. The identity of treatment of the specimen shown in figs.
_d_ and _f_ is interesting. The former was collected by Captain Adrian
Jacobsen, 1884, and the latter by Captain Cook more than a hundred
years earlier. The double mask, fig. _a_, resembles them in general
shape, but the eye is treated quite differently and the ear, while
narrow, is not pointed and the backward slant of the snout is not
sufficiently pronounced. The double-headed wolf dish (_e_), has small
reclining ears and long eyes. The ears of figs. _c_, _d_, _e_, are
small and recline, but the eye of _c_ and _d_ is rounded.
[111] See Social Organization and Secret Societies of the Kwakiutl
Indians, Annual Report of the United States National Museum, 1895, p.
477, illustrations p. 493, Plate 37.
The forms of animals used by the northern tribes vary considerably
also. It is not safe to base our arguments on models or on objects made
for the trade. I shall use, therefore, exclusively, older specimens
which have been in use.
[Illustration: Fig. 199. House post, Haida.]
[Illustration: Fig. 200. Designs from a set of gambling sticks.]
[Illustration: Fig. 201. Designs from a set of gambling sticks.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account