Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
There are very few designs which can possibly be interpreted as
full-face views of animals. I explained before that the face of the
shark is always shown in this manner, because its symbols appear best
in this position. The only other animal which is painted or carved
on flat surfaces in full front view is the hawk or thunder-bird,
whose symbol is the long beak which descends to the chin. A number of
carvings representing the thunder-bird were given in figs. 165-168 (p.
191).
We find full-face representations of the thunder-bird frequently
used on dishes, on which the beak is indicated by a long wedge which
separates the mouth into two halves. It is, however, not certain
whether the artists consider this face always as a full front view,
because we often find (fig. 243) a depression between the two eyes,
corresponding to the depression which I described before when
referring to the joining of the profiles of animals. It may be that
the long central wedge must be considered as the two halves of the
long descending beak, which join in the middle. It might be expected,
however, that in this case the beak would, at least sometimes, be
carried on outward to the right and to the left below the chin,
corresponding to one-half of the beak seen in fig. 166 (p. 191). I have
not observed a single specimen in which this is the case, and therefore
I am inclined to consider the carvings of thunder-birds on dishes as
full front views.
[Illustration: Fig. 244. Painting from a house-front representing
thunder-bird, Kwakiutl.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account