Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
This ornament may have originated in the following manner: Many grease
and food dishes have the form of canoes. The canoe symbolizes that a
canoe-load of food is presented to the guests; and that this view is
probably correct is indicated by the fact that the host in his speeches
sometimes refers to the canoe filled with food which he gives to his
guests. The canoe form is often modified, and a whole series of types
may be established forming the transition between canoe dishes and
ordinary trays. Dishes of this sort always bear a conventionalized
face at each short end, while the middle part is not decorated. This
is analogous to the style of the decoration of the canoe. On the whole
the decoration of the canoe is totemic. It may, however, be that the
peculiar manner in which the beak of the hawk is represented has given
rise to the prevalence of this decoration. The upper jaw of the hawk
is always shown so that its point reaches the lower jaw and turns
back into the mouth. When painted or carved in front view the beak is
indicated by a narrow wedge-shaped strip in the middle of the face,
the point of which touches the lower margin of the chin. The sharp
bow and stern of a canoe with a profile of a face on each side, when
represented on a level or slightly rounded surface, would assume the
same shape. Therefore it may be that originally the middle line was not
the beak of the hawk, but the foreshortened bow or stern of the canoe.
This decoration is so uniform that the explanation given here seems to
me probable.
In fig. 244 we see a painting representing a full front view of the
thunder-bird. Its principal symbol is the long beak, which in front
view appears like a long line descending from the nose over the mouth.
In this case it is doubtful whether the body may be considered as being
split along the back. Since the face is certainly represented in front
view, it seems more likely that the animal is represented with spread
wings, similar to the eagle in fig. 241.
I have described a number of dissections applied in representing
various animals. Heretofore we have had cases only in which the
dissections were rather simple. In many cases in which the adaptation
of the animal form to the decorative field is more difficult, the
sections and distortions are much more far-reaching than those
described before.
[Illustration: Fig. 245. Model of totem pole with design representing a
killer-whale, Haida.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account