Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
There are a number of peculiar developments of the head and body
designs which are used on small food trays, the sides of which are
bent out of a single plank. In one group of these (fig. 282) the two
narrow sides represent, in front, the head of the animal; on the
opposite, side the tail. This appears most clearly in figs. 282 _b_
and _d_; both representing the beaver. In fig. 282 _d_ the beaver’s
head and tail are perfectly plain. In 282 _b_ there is considerable
confusion; the beaver’s body below is provided with two human arms and
over it is indicated the large characteristic head. The tail is shown
on the opposite short side, together with the hind legs and the two
disconnected eyes which ordinarily would form the hip joints and would
be connected with the upper end of the thighs. On all these specimens,
282 _a_, _b_, and _c_, the other sides show an inverted face. This
originates evidently in such a way that the eyes represent, at one
end, the shoulder joints, at the opposite end, the hip joints, but
instead of developing the sides as fore and hind legs, the inverted
eyes have lead to the development of a face design which has no
particular relation to the animal represented. In other words, we find
here, as well as in many other places that elements which are in part
derived from representations of parts of animals, have assumed a purely
decorative function so that an explanation of the details is, to a
great extend, arbitrary. The geometrical decoration on the long side
of fig. 282 _d_ is also derived from the shoulder and hip joints, but
instead of parts of a face, slit designs fill in the rest of the side.
[Illustration: Fig. 283. Carved trays.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account