Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
The trays shown in fig. 283 are of the same make as those shown
before, with the only difference that on the long sides the shoulder
joints, knee and foot are shown in the ordinary way. The hind limbs
are here represented on the short side, where the hip joints are
shown by two large eyes in the upper part of the design. It will be
observed, however, that in these cases also there is a considerable
amount of arbitrary use of decorative elements that have no particular
significance, but which must be considered simply as fillers. This
appears most clearly in fig. 283 _e_, which represents a dish with a
design of a human being. Here the arms are represented on the long
sides, the shoulder joint by an eye which, however, is provided with
lids. The space under the eye is filled in with a mouth which has
no function in this position. It is evidently introduced in the same
way as the profile faces which serve as fillers on the blankets. The
most distinctive specimen of this type is shown in fig. 283 _f_. It
represents a beaver, the face indicated by disconnected eyes, mouth,
and ear; the nose showing the form of one of the conventional copper
plates used by the northwest coast Indians, while the face in the
middle of the upper border is purely ornamental. The opposite short
side shows very clearly a tail, hip, legs, and feet and on the long
side also the large shoulder joint in the form of an eye with ear; the
arm and the foot are distinctly shown but here also, by the addition of
four teeth, the shoulder joint is elaborated in the form of a face; the
eyes in the corners of the long field are purely ornamental.
[Illustration: Fig. 284. Carved trays.]
To the same group belong also the carved trays cut out of a single
piece of wood, shown in fig. 284. Here we have only the head design
which is adjusted to the curvature of the upper border of the
decorative field. The lines of the face are drawn so as to conform to
the decorative field.
It will be observed that the eyes of the large head in the blankets
are always almost horizontal while those on the boxes and trays are
strongly inclined. I presume this is due to the tendency to avoid
massing of parallel lines.
[Illustration: Fig. 285. Designs on Tlingit armor.]
The large head design found on the blankets and boxes occurs also on
the paintings in the center of the front of slat armour. The lateral
panels are missing and the design consists simply of the head with
attached shoulder, arm, and hand (fig. 285).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account