Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
[Illustration: Fig. 306. _a_, Rawhide pouch, Salish or Chinook; _b_,
Design from parfleche, Fort Colville, Washington.]
As soon as we move farther inland we find an art that, in its
essential characteristics, is subject to the Plains art. The style and
decoration of the clothing are essentially those of the Plains. Rude
pictography is used extensively. There is hardly any attempt to fit the
pictographic representation to the decorative field that serves merely
as the background on which the representative design is conveniently
placed. Most of the geometric patterns that do occur are closely
related to eastern forms. A rawhide pouch from the interior of British
Columbia (fig. 28, p. 36) may serve as an example. On parfleches and
rawhide pouches from Fort Colville and from Columbia River (fig. 306)
we find the same designs that are characteristic of eastern paintings
on rawhide (see figs. 144-146 pp. 170-172). Analogous forms are found
in bone carvings from the Tahltan in Alaska (fig. 307). In the southern
parts of the plateaus of British Columbia, simple lines and circles
with center are the most common decorative pattern on bone and on wood.
Representative sculpture is rare although a few ancient specimens have
been found. The archaeological remains prove that at an early time the
same art type prevailed in the Delta of Fraser River. The symbolism of
the patterns is very weak, but seems analogous to that found in the
east.
[Illustration: Fig. 307. Scraper of bone, Tahltan.]
[Illustration: Fig. 308. Detail of imbricated basketry.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account