Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
These conditions are well-described by Sophus Müller, who says,[19]
“A great part of the work on flint must be designated as luxury, and
was done with the sole intent of producing a masterpiece of handiwork.
When making an adze blade all that is needed for practical purposes
is a good cutting edge. Smoothness of face, back and sides is not
necessary, particularly since a large portion of these were covered
by the attachment to the handle. With coarse and conchoidal chipping
the blade would be equally serviceable. However, the maker wanted to
produce excellent stone work, to the making of which he devoted all
the care, taste and skill at his command and by this the manufactured
objects undoubtedly increased in value. These objects might be called
therefore, in the strict sense of the term, works of artistic industry.”
[19] Sophus Müller, Nordische Altertumskunde, Strassburg 1897, Vol. I,
p. 190.
All these examples show that complete automatic control of a technique,
and regularity of form and surface pattern are intimately correlated.
[Illustration: Fig. 6. Part of surface of wooden sail, Vancouver
Island.]
[Illustration: Fig. 7. Painted board, Tierra del Fuego.]
[Illustration: Fig. 8. Bushman designs from ostrich eggs and from horn
bracelet.]
[Illustration: Fig. 9. Kaffer headrests.]
However, besides these, attempts at decoration occur in which a mastery
of technique has not been attained. Among a few tribes almost all
artistic work is of this character. Among the inhabitants of Tierra
del Fuego are found only meagre examples of painting, lacking in skill
(fig. 7). The patterns are simply dots and coarse lines in which
the arrangement is the essential artistic element. It is intelligible
that a feeling for symmetry may exist without the ability of perfect
execution. The modern Bushmen scratch patterns on ostrich eggs which
serve as receptacles for water (fig. 8). Here we find the intent to
give expression to form but with inadequate means. It is important to
note that the same motive, two circles connected by a narrow band,
occurs several times in these etchings. The circle might be suggested
to the workman by the perforation of the shell of the ostrich egg
through which the water is poured out, but the combination can hardly
be derived on the basis of Bushman industries. Shall we consider the
pattern as the result of the play of their imagination or as an attempt
at representation? It seems to me important to note that the neighbors
of the Bushmen, the negroes of the Zambezi, use the same pattern and
that rows of triangles and diamonds, such as are used by the Bushmen,
are found on their implements also (fig. 9). The pattern may therefore
have come from an outside source.[20] Perhaps the decoration on ostrich
eggs is poor only on account of the difficulties of handling the
material. At least the zig-zag patterns (fig. 8), found on a bracelet,
show a much greater technical perfection than those found on the
ostrich eggs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account