Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
more accurate than a method depending on a reference to the phases
of Nature. However it would seem as if this mode of indicating time
would require a greater knowledge of the stars, such as only few
peoples possess,--as if it would constantly be necessary to observe
a fresh star for each of the smaller divisions of time. This is not
the case, since, as appears from statements already made, for the
purpose of determining the seasons a star may be observed when it is
stationed at other positions in the sky than on the horizon, e. g.,
very conveniently, at its upper culmination, but other positions,
expressed by us in so many degrees above the horizon, may also serve.
Just as the advance of the day is discerned from the position of
the sun, so the advance of the year is recognised by the position
of certain stars at sunrise and sunset. Stars and sun alike are
the indicators of the dial of the heavens. A determination of this
kind, however, is not so accurate as that from the heliacal risings
and settings. Hence the latter pass almost exclusively or at least
pre-eminently under consideration wherever, as in Greece, a calendar
of the natural year is based upon the stars: sometimes however the
upper culmination (μεσουράνημα) is also given. Finally the stars can
also be observed at other times of night than just before sunrise
or after sunset[549]: the Marshall Islanders, for instance, were
accustomed to observe the signs of the weather at 4 a. m. With the
lack of a means of accurately telling the time such an observation is
very uncertain and unpractical, and is therefore seldom found.
In order to determine the time of certain important natural phenomena
it is therefore sufficient to know and observe a few stars or
constellations with accuracy and certainty. The Pleiades are the most
important[550]. It has been asked why this particular constellation,
consisting as it does of comparatively small and unimportant stars,
should have played so great a part, and the answer given is chiefly
that its appearance coincides (though this is true of other stars
also) with important phases of the vegetation. This is correct, but
something else must be added. To create constellations in which
terrestrial objects, animals, and men are arbitrarily seen requires
no inconsiderable degree of imaginative power. The Pleiades however
form themselves into a group without any aid from the imagination,
and can without difficulty be recognised as such. It is because they
are easy to recognise immediately that the observation of these stars
plays so important a part. A similar case is that of the Magellanic
Clouds, which, where they are visible, belong to the best known
phenomena of the heavens, and we may also compare the dark starless
patches which so largely occupy the attention of primitive peoples,
although neither of these two phenomena is used in determining time,
since neither can be observed at the favourable moment, viz. the
twilight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account