saturated with vapor at the temperature of the experiment.
During the course of the analysis, the temperature of the measuring
flask, which is almost entirely surrounded with water, does not vary
sensibly, but in a series of experiments which are executed at different
times, the temperature of the measuring apparatus, which is that of the
ambient air, may change much. It may oscillate between 10° to 25°, and
exceptionally between 0° and 30°, whence there are notable variations in
the tension of the vapor of the gas measured. If it should be desired to
calculate to 100 parts of dry gas the observations made at 30° upon 100
parts of saturated gas, it would be necessary to increase the percentage
of carbon dioxid by about ¹⁄₂₅ of its value. It is noticed that with the
apparatus described above, the gas upon which the estimation is really
conducted comprises not only that which the measuring apparatus contains
from E to C before the absorption of the carbon dioxid, but also the
small quantity which remains in the capillary tube KME at the moment
when closing the pinch-cock M, after the second rinsing, the gas from
the soil is aspired into EAC. On the other hand, there is left in the
same tube KME, when the final reading is made, some gas which belongs to
that which has been measured at the end. These two small gaseous
portions which we consider in the tube KME to be sensibly equal, do not
contain any carbon dioxid and may be left out of consideration. That is
why the volume of the measuring apparatus is limited to E and the
graduation of the tube BC is in hundredths of the volume comprised from
E to C. In reality the two portions are not absolutely equal because the
two successive levels of the potash solution, which limit them in the
tube K, are not absolutely identical. These two levels can differ in
such a manner as to correspond to a volume of about ¹⁄₁₀₀₀ of the
measuring apparatus. Thus the estimation is really made upon a volume of
gas which may be greater or less by ¹⁄₁₀₀₀ than the volume of EAC;
whence there might result an error of ¹⁄₁₀₀₀ in the estimation of the
carbon dioxid, an error which is wholly negligible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account