=232. Destruction of Organic Matter by Direct Ignition.=—The simplest
and most direct method for destroying organic matter is by direct
ignition. The incineration may be conducted in the open air or in a
muffle and the temperature should be as low as possible. In no case
should a low red heat be exceeded. By reason of the moderate draft
produced in a muffle and the more even heat which can be maintained
this method of burning is to be preferred. With the exercise of due
care, however, excellent results can be obtained in an open dish
or one partly closed with a lid. At first, with many samples, the
organic matter will burn of its own accord after it is once ignited,
and during this combustion the lamp should be withdrawn. The ignition
in most cases should be continued in a platinum dish but should the
sample contain any reducible metal capable of injuring the platinum a
porcelain vessel should be used. The lamp should give a diffused flame
to avoid overheating of any portions of the dish and to secure more
uniform combustion. In using a muffle the heat employed should be only
great enough to secure combustion and the draft should be so regulated
as to avoid loss due to the mechanical deportation of the ash particles.
=233. Ignition with Sulfuric Acid.=—The favorable action of sulfuric
acid in securing a perfect incineration may also be utilized in
the preparation of samples containing organic matter for potash
determinations. In this case the bases which by direct ignition would
be secured as carbonates are obtained as sulfates. In the method
adopted by the official chemists it is directed to saturate the sample
with sulfuric acid and to ignite in a muffle until all organic matter
is destroyed.[192] Afterwards, when cool the ash is moistened with a
little hydrochloric acid and warmed, whereby it is the more easily
detached from the dish. The potash is then determined by any one of the
standard methods. This method has several advantages over the direct
ignition. Where any chlorids of the alkalies are present in the ash
there is danger of loss of potash from volatilization. This is avoided
by the sulfate process. Moreover, there is not so much danger in this
method of occluding particles of carbon in the ash.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account