Ampère had sought for some sort of mechanism for the transmission of
electromagnetic currents. His own discoveries and those of Örsted
led him to formulate the hypothesis that the field in the vicinity
of a magnetic body is produced by a number of exceedingly small
circular currents which flow undamped in or around the molecules
and that magnetization consists merely of the bringing of these
molecular currents into a parallel direction. But it was difficult for
some physicists, even in Ampère’s day, to accept the hypothesis of
undiminished currents _possessing no resistance_.
If we transform the idea of the “molecular currents” of Ampère into
the language of today, substituting for these molecular currents
electrons revolving in atoms, it can be shown that the great French
scientist was substantially correct in his assumptions. In 1915 Dr.
Albert Einstein and W. J. de Haas astonished the world of physicists by
showing experimentally—by means of a most ingenious apparatus—that the
“molecular currents” or revolving electrons really exist.
In 1919, Professor Kramerlingh-Onnes, at the University of Leyden, was
able to produce what he called _imitations of ampere currents_—i.
e., “undiminished currents producing no resistance.” It was
demonstrated that the resistance of pure gold and pure platinum differ
very little if at all from nil at low temperatures. But wires of these
metals, of absolute purity, are difficult to obtain, so mercury was
selected for the experiments. The resistance of the metal at the lowest
attainable temperature of liquefied helium,-271.5° C., (at a pressure
of 3 mm. of the mercury column), proved to be immeasurably small. The
resistance down to a position shortly below 4.2° K. (Kelvin’s absolute
scale) suddenly dropped from a measurable amount to a value practically
nil. It was found that the induced current remained in a state of
circulation, and that the decrease in the strength of the current
amounted to less than 1 per cent per hour, from which it followed that
the “time of relaxation” must amount to more than four days![13]
At the absolute zero of temperature, it is supposed that the orbits of
electrons in atoms are perfect circles, whatever their paths may be at
measurable temperatures. This motion of the electrons remains when all
heat has disappeared, since it is not this motion of the revolution of
the electrons in their orbits that is associated with the energy of
heat. Heat is _a mode of motion of the atoms themselves_, not of
their contained electrons; though increase of heat doubtless results in
an increase in the average orbital velocity of the electrons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account