The Æpinian theory of electricity and of magnetism was modified and
presented in a new form (in 1788) by Coulomb, with two fluids instead
of one. His first task, before reducing the theory to calculation,
was to determine the law of the forces involved—not being satisfied,
for example, with Newton’s assumption that the attractive force of
magnetism is inversely to the _cube_ of the distance. Mayer in
1760, and Lambert a few years later, had found the law to be that of
the inverse square. Coulomb desired experimental confirmation of this
law before accepting it as established. This he secured by means of
his torsion-balance (about 1784).[20]
It was in pursuance of this investigation that Coulomb brought to light
for the first time the fact that the directive magnetic forces which
the earth exerts upon a needle is a constant quantity, parallel to the
magnetic meridian, and passing through the same point of the needle
whatever be its position.
Barlow, who had adopted the two-fluid hypothesis, showed that the
magnetic “fluids” were collected at the surface of spheres (of iron),
the surface being the only part in which there could be detected any
magnetism. He demonstrated that a shell of iron produces the same
effect as a solid ball of the same diameter. Poisson’s later analysis
(1824) showed that this was a consequent to be expected. Merz has well
said that what Laplace did for Newton was done by Poisson (1781-1840)
“for Coulomb’s elementary law of electric and magnetic action, and
on a still larger scale by Gauss, who worked out the mathematical
theory and applied it to the case of the magnetic distribution on the
earth’s surface. In England, already before Coulomb’s researches were
published, Cavendish had, likewise by a combination of experiment and
calculation, established the elementary formulae and properties of
electrical phenomena.”[21]
Benjamin Franklin, the first American to gain international renown as a
scientist, adopted and developed a “one-fluid theory of electricity.”
On this supposition the parts of the fluid repel each other, and
the excess in one surface of the glass—for example—repels the fluid
from the other surface. The fluid itself was regarded by Franklin as
positive, the part of the other (negative electricity) being taken by
ordinary matter, the particles of which were supposed to repel each
other and attract the positive fluid, just as the particles of the
negative fluid did on the two-fluid theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account