This could be accounted for only on the theory that light is affected
by magnetism, since the beam was not rotated by the glass alone—in
itself a very important discovery. But the experiment did not yield
Faraday an answer to the question uppermost in his mind: namely, can
a magnetic field change the rate of vibration of a light-emitting
particle? That is to say, in effect, can a magnetic field cause a ray
of light to shift its normal place in the spectrum?
It was not until 1862, seventeen years after the experiment just
described, that Faraday attempted to solve this important theoretical
problem. He now placed a sodium flame in front of the slit of the
spectroscope, which normally yields two characteristic yellow lines
(the D lines of the spectrum), and observed them with the best
spectroscope at his command, under the most powerful electromagnetic
field which he could produce. No change from the normal could be
detected. Other observers tried the same experiment, but with negative
results. We know that his theory was well founded, and that only the
lack of a better spectroscope and a more powerful magnet prevented his
discovery of what is now known as the Zeeman effect—a discovery which
has already thrown a flood of light on a number of difficult physical
problems.[23]
Working with much more powerful apparatus, but following the same
method of procedure employed by the immortal Faraday, Dr. Pieter
Zeeman, of Leyden, succeeded, in 1896, in experimentally demonstrating
the close relationship between light and magnetism. Dr. H. A. Lorentz,
then Professor of Physics in the University of Leyden, now mathematical
physicist at the Norman Bridge Laboratory of Physics, Pasadena,
California, had predicted the nature of the change in the spectral
lines to be expected, and this knowledge was used by Dr. Zeeman as a
check on his results.
Using a Rowland grating, instead of a less efficient prism
spectroscope, Dr. Zeeman found that when a relatively weak electric
current was applied, the two sodium lines were merely widened. In a
still more powerful magnetic field, each of the lines was decomposed
into two or three components, when the lines of force were parallel
to the line of sight.[24] Moreover, the rays of the components of
each line “were not those of natural light,” but were “polarized in
a characteristic way,” i. e., were circularly polarized in opposite
directions—“the direction of the vibration depending in a simple manner
on the direction of the magnetic lines of force.”[25]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account