Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
The differences between the mental processes involved in the
two cases are very great, though easily overlooked. Consider
what failure for each use amounts to. For scientific language
a difference in the references is itself failure: the end has
not been attained. But for emotive language the widest differences
in reference are of no importance if the further effects in attitude
and emotion are of the required kind.
Further, in the scientific use of language not only must the
references be correct for success, but the connections and relations
of references to one another must be of the kind which we call
logical. They must not get in one another’s way, and must be
so organised as not to impede further reference. But for emotive
purposes logical arrangement is not necessary. It may be and
often is an obstacle. For what matters is that the series of
attitudes due to the references should have their own proper
organisation, their own emotional interconnection, and this often
has no dependence upon the logical relations of such references
as may be concerned in bringing the attitudes into being.
A few notes of the chief uses of the word ‘Truth’ in Criticism
may help to prevent misunderstanding:—
1. The scientific sense that, namely, in which references, and
derivatively statements symbolising references, are true, need
not delay us. A reference is true when the things to which it
refers are actually together in the way in which it refers to
them. Otherwise it is false. This sense is one very little involved
by any of the arts. For the avoidance of confusions it would
be well if the term ‘true’ could be reserved for this use. In
purely scientific discourse it could and should be, but such
discourse is uncommon. In point of fact the emotive power which
attaches to the word is far too great for it to be abandoned
in general discussion; the temptation to a speaker who needs
to stir certain emotions and evoke certain attitudes of approval
and acceptance is overwhelming. No matter how various the senses
in which it may be used, and even when it is being used in no
sense whatever, its effects in promoting attitudes will still
make it indispensable; people will still continue to use the
word with the same promiscuity as ever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account