Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
Since the poet’s unconscious motives have been alluded to, it
may be well at this point to make a few additional remarks. Whatever
psycho-analysts may aver, the mental processes of the poet are
not a very profitable field for investigation. They offer far
too happy a hunting-ground for uncontrollable conjecture. Much
that goes to produce a poem is, of course, unconscious. Very
likely the unconscious processes are more important than the
conscious, but even if we knew far more than we do about how
the mind works, the attempt to display the inner working of the
artist’s mind by the evidence of his work alone must be subject
to the gravest dangers. And to judge by the published work of
Freud upon Leonardo da Vinci or of Jung upon Goethe (e.g. _The
Psychology of the Unconscious_, p. 305), psycho-analysts tend
to be peculiarly inept as critics.
The difficulty is that nearly all speculations as to what went
on in the artist’s mind are unverifiable, even more unverifiable
than the similar speculations as to the dreamer’s mind. The most
plausible explanations are apt to depend upon features whose
actual causation is otherwise. I do not know whether anyone but
Mr Graves has attempted to analyse _Kubla Khan_, a poem
which by its mode of composition and by its subject suggests
itself as well fitted for analysis. The reader acquainted with
current methods of analysis can imagine the results of a thoroughgoing
Freudian onslaught.
If he will then open _Paradise Lost_, Book IV at line 223,
and read onwards: for sixty lines, he will encounter the actual
sources of not a few of the images and phrases of the poem. In
spite of—
Southward through _Eden_ went a River large,
Nor changed his course, but through the shaggie hill
Pass’d underneath ingulft . . .
in spite of—
Rose a fresh Fountain, and with many a rill
Waterd the Garden; thence united fell
Down the steep glade, and met the neather Flood . . .
in spite of—
Rowling on Orient Pearl and sands of Gold
With mazie error under pendant shades
Ran Nectar . . .
in spite of—
Meanwhile murmuring waters fall
Down the slope hills, disperst . . .
his doubts may still linger until he reaches
Nor where _Abassin_ Kings thir issue Guard,
Mount Amara.
and one of the most cryptic points in Coleridge’s poem, the Abyssinian
maid, singing of Mount Abora, finds its simple explanation. The
closing line of the poem perhaps hardly needs this kind of derivation.
From one source or another almost all the matter of _Kubla
Khan_ came to Coleridge in a similar fashion. I do not know
whether this particular indebtedness has been remarked before,
but _Purchas his Pilgrimage_, Bartram’s _Travels in North
and South Carolina_, and Maurice’s _History of Hindostan_
are well-known sources, some of them indicated by Coleridge himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account