Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
A few specimens of the most famous utterances of Aristotle, Longinus,
Horace, Boileau, Dryden, Addison, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Carlyle,
Matthew Arnold, and some more modern authors, will justify this
assertion. “All men naturally receive pleasure from imitation.”
“Poetry is chiefly conversant about general truth.” “It demands
an enthusiasm allied to madness; transported out of ourselves
we become what we imagine.” “Beautiful words are the very and
peculiar light of the mind.” “Let the work be what you like,
provided it has simplicity and unity.” “De Gustibus. . .” “Of
writing well right thinking is the beginning and the fount.”
“We must never separate ourselves from Nature.” “Delight is the
chief, if not the only end; instruction can be admitted but in
the second place.” “The pleasures of Fancy are more conducive
to health than those of the understanding.” “The spontaneous
overflow of powerful feeling.” “The best words in the best order.”
“The whole soul of man in activity.” “Unity in variety.” “The
synthetic and magical power of the imagination.” “The eye on
the object.” “The disimprisonment of the soul of fact.” “The
identification of content and form.” “A criticism of Life.” “Empathy
favourable to our existence.” “Significant form.” “The expression
of impressions,” etc. etc.
Such are the pinnacles, the _apices_ of critical theory,
the heights gained in the past by the best thinkers in their
attempt to reach explanations of the value of the arts. Some
of them, many of them indeed, are profitable starting-points
for reflection, but neither together, nor singly, nor in any
combination do they give what is required. Above them and below
them, around and about them can be found other things of value,
of service for the appreciation of particular poems and works
of art; comment, elucidation, appraisal, much that is fit occupation
for the contemplative mind. But apart from hints such as have
been cited, no explanations. The central question, What is the
value of the arts, why are they worth the devotion of the keenest
hours of the best minds, and what is their place in the system
of human endeavours? is left almost untouched, although without
some clear view it would seem that even the most judicious critic
must often lose his sense of position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account