Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1Roscher, Wilhelm
History
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
115 According to _Th. Cooper_, Lectures on the Elements of Political
Economy, (1726), 1, 15 ff. 117, the wealth of society is nothing but
the aggregate wealth of all the individuals that compose it. Each
individual looks out best for his own interests, and, hence, that
nation must be the richest, in which each individual is most
completely left to himself. (If this were so, savage nations would
be the richest!) _Cooper_ goes so far as to disapprove of the
protection afforded to commerce on the high seas by a national navy;
no naval war is worth what it costs, and merchants should protect
themselves. He says, too, that the word “nation” is an invention of
the grammarians, made to save the trouble of circumlocution, a
nonentity! _Adam Smith_ is, as might be expected, far removed from
such absurdities. (Compare Wealth of Nations, IV, ch. 2, and the end
of the fourth book.) But, even he is of opinion that men, in the
study of their own advantage are led “naturally, or rather
necessarily” (IV, ch. 2), to the employment which is most useful to
society. But here _Adam Smith_ overlooks the fact, that every
individual nation strives after earthly immortality, and is, in
consequence, frequently compelled to make immediate sacrifices for
the sake of a distant future, a thing which can never be to the
private interest of the mortal individuals who compose it. And thus,
_D. North_, Discourses upon Trade (1691), 13 seq., says, that in
commercial matters, different nations stand in precisely the same
relation to the whole world, that individual cities do to the
kingdom, and individual families to the city. Similarly,
_Boisguillebert_, Factum de la France, ch. 10, 327, Daire’s edition.
_Benjamin Franklin_ (ob. 1790), Political Papers, § 4. And _J. B.
Say_, Traité d’Economie politique (1802) I, 15: every nation is, in
relation to neighboring nations, in the situation of a province in
relation to neighboring provinces. Unfortunately, such doctrine is
only too palpably refuted by every war! _J. Bentham’s_ saying: _Les
intérêts individuels sont les seuls intérêts réels_ (Traité de
Législation, I, 229). _Infra_ § 98.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account