Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1Roscher, Wilhelm
History
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
393 Concerning association in general, see _M. Chevalier_, Cours, III,
Leçon, 24, 25. On this subject so much talked of in our day, see,
more in detail, concerning its application to agriculture, my work,
Nationalökonomik des Ackerbaues, 4, § 39, 47 ff.; 68, 133 ff.; on
its application to industry, especially where there is question of
the relation of handiwork and manufactures to large factories; see
_Roscher_, Ansichten der Volkswirthschaft, II, Aufl., 1861,
Abhandlung, IV, V.
_ 394 Adam Smith_ remarked that the laws of the division of labor obtain
also in intellectual works; and indeed, among all nations in a very
low grade of civilization, the germs of all art and science are
found connected with theology; and later, the germs of all poetry
and history with the epic. The expression: _non defuit homini, sed
scientiæ, quod nescivit Salmasius_, is a clear proof of the
insignificance of the science of the time. Think of the increase
during the last hundred years of the branches of study in our German
universities. There are now thirty-four regular professors in the
Leipzig philosophical faculty, where then there were only nine. But
here also the principle proves true, that an excessive division of
labor, where the broader connection and the deeper foundation of all
sciences disappear from the consciousness, undermines intellectual
health and freedom. And the injury here is greater and more
irreparable than in the domain of mere physical labor. See
_Hufeland_, N. Grundlegung, I, 207 ff. If we have just become
Alexandrians, we have, however, no Aristotle to hope for.
_Jurisprudentia est divinarum atque humanarum rerum notitia, justi
atque injusti scientia_ (_Ulpian_). It is remarkable that nations
who possess no real national literature of their own, when they once
get beyond the bounds of utter barbarism, learn foreign languages
etc., most easily.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive