Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 2Roscher, Wilhelm
General
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 2
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
[Footnote 191-12: Compare _Gioja_, Nuovo Prospetto, III,
190. The canon law desired to put an interdict on their
taking interest also: Decret. Greg., V, tit. 19, 12, 18.
Frequently, also, a minimum of interest was provided for
them: Ordonnances de la Fr., L. 53 seq. II, 575. Receuil des
anciennes, Lois, I, 149, 152. John of France extended this
to four _deniers_ per _livre_ per week, that is, annually
86-2/3 per cent.! (_J. B. Say_, Traité II, ch. 8.) In
Austria, in 1244, 174 per cent. allowed! (_Rizy_, Ueber
Zinstaxen und Wuchergesetze, 1859, 72 ff.)]
SECTION CXCII.
INTEREST-POLICY.--GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE.--FIXED RATES.
Instead of the medieval prohibition of interest, most modern states have
established fixed rates of interest, the exceeding or evasion of which,
by contract or otherwise, is declared null and void, and is usually
punishable as usury.[192-1] If the fixing of the rate is intended to
depress the rate of interest customary in the country,[192-2] [192-3] it
uniformly fails of its object. If control were great enough, vigilant
and rigid enough, which is scarcely imaginable, to prevent all
violations of the law, it is certain that less capital would be loaned
than had been, for the reason that every owner of capital would be
largely interested in employing his capital in production of his own.
More capital, too, would go into foreign parts, and there would be less
saved by those not engaged in any enterprise of their own. All of this
would happen to the undoubted prejudice of the nation's entire
economy.[192-4] [192-5]
If, on the other hand, the control by the government be not great
enough, the law would, in most cases, be evaded; especially as each
party, creditor as well as debtor, would find it to his advantage to
evade it. The latter, who otherwise would not be able to borrow at all,
is, as a rule, more in need of obtaining the loan, than the creditor is
to invest his capital. How easily, therefore, might he be induced to
bind himself by oath or by word of honor![192-6] He would, moreover, be
compelled to pay the creditor not only the natural interest and the
ordinary insurance premium, but also for the special risk he runs when
he violates the law threatening him with a severe penalty.[192-7] Hence
the last result is either a material enhancement of the difficulty of
obtaining loans or an enhancement of the rate of interest.[192-8]
[Footnote 192-1: This is, historically, the second meaning
of the word usury, while in the middle ages, for instance in
England, under Elizabeth (_D. Hume_), the taking of any
interest whatever was called usury. Science should employ
this word only in the sense used in § 113.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account