Printing Telegraphy... A New Era Begins — John Shaqi
Printing Telegraphy... A New Era BeginsKleinschmidt, Edward E.
History
Printing Telegraphy... A New Era Begins
Kleinschmidt, Edward E.
SCM Corporation. Kleinschmidt Division; Telegraph -- Equipment and supplies; Teletype -- History
The Edison Electric Illuminating Company of Boston tried out the
master clock on October 23, 1916. Since then this regulation has
continued.
Other power companies adopted Warren’s master clock. Today virtually
all alternating current furnished in America is similarly checked.
Practical electric time is available at the light socket almost
everywhere. But there are additional benefits.
Standardizing the frequency expanded the market for current to run the
increasing number of clocks in use. Yet, from the consumer’s point of
view, each clock draws little current, costing but a few pennies a
month. Uniform frequency also gave more even speeds in motor-driven
machinery, with a resultant improvement in product. It made easier the
joining of one power station to another. Synchronous motors used in
certain meters and recorders produced better, more accurate records at
lower cost.
The Warren enterprise expanded rapidly. The battery clock was
discontinued. The red barn was no longer large enough, and new space
was acquired. The trade mark “Telechron,” meaning “time from a
distance” (from two Greek words), was used to identify all products of
the company. The firm name was changed to stress the name Telechron,
and in 1952 a merger was made with the General Electric Company.
Plants are now operated in Worcester as well as in Ashland,
Massachusetts.
And now back to the telegraph field....
CHAPTER 4
Morkrum-Kleinschmidt Corporation
(later renamed “Teletype Corporation”)
During and after the first world war, both the Morkrum Company and the
Kleinschmidt Electric Company were progressively developing and
producing telegraph apparatus and bringing out new and improved
operating devices to a point where conflicting patents were at issue.
This meant infringement litigation which might destroy both companies.
Neither company could obtain orders in sufficient quantity to make the
manufacturing of apparatus profitable, and, with costly development work
at hand, more capital investment was a continuous requirement.
The following excerpts from the March 1932 issue of _Fortune_[9] tells
of the final joining of the two companies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account