[4] 2 William and Mary, St. 2, c 2, 1690. [5] The Lord High Admirals since 1690 have been, Prince George of Denmark, husband of Queen Anne, 1702-1708; The Earl of Pembroke, 1708-1710; The Duke of Clarence, afterwards, William IV, 1827-1828. [6] See ante p. 56 et seq. [7] 13 Ric. II, c 5, 1390; 15 Ric. II, c 3, 1392. [8] Le Caux vs Eden, 2 Doug. 595; 99 Eng. Rep. 375; Lindo vs Rodney, 2 Doug. 613; 99 Eng. Rep. 385. See also Phillimore, op. cit. iii, 213. [9] See post p. 84. [10] E. S. Roscoe, The Growth of English Law, London, 1911, p. 139. [11] 3 and 4 Vict., c 65, s 22, 1840. [12] 9 and 10 Vict., c 99, 1846. [13] 17 and 18 Vict., c 104, 1854. [14] 24 and 25 Vict., c 10, 1861. [15] 31 and 32 Vict., c 71, 1868. [16] 36 and 37 Vict., c 66, 1873. [17] 38 and 39 Vict., c 66, 1873. [18] 54 and 55 Vict., c 53, s 4, 1891. [19] Cal. St. Pap. Col. America and West Indies, 1661-1668, p. 112, s 379; Marsdon, English, Historical Review, xxvi, 53. [20] 2 and 3 William IV, c 51, 1832. [21] 26 and 27 Vict., c 24, 1863. [22] 30 and 31 Vict., c 45, 1867. [23] 53 and 54 Vict., c 27, 1890. [24] Blackstone, Commentaries, iii, 108. [25] Phillimore, op. cit. iii, 655; see also post p. 86. [26] Roscoe, op. cit. p. 125; Hannis Taylor, The Origin and Growth of the English Constitution, 3rd Edition, 2 Vols., Boston, 1895, i, 550. [27] 27 and 28 Vict., c 25, ss 3, 4, 5, 6. [28] 54 and 55 Vict., c 53, s 4, 1891. [29] 27 and 28 Vict., c 25, 1864. [30] "This Jurisdiction is permanent and unlike that of the prize courts in British possessions requires no commission from his majesty, proclamation of war, or other executive act to bring it into operation." The Earl of Halsbury, The Laws of England, London, 1907-1912, xxiii, 276. [31] 57 and 58 Vict., c 39, 1894. [32] 27 and 28 Vict., c 25, 1864. [33] 25 Hen. VIII, c 19, s 3, 4, 1534. [34] 2 and 3 William IV, c 92, 1833. [35] 2 and 3 William IV, c 52, 1833. [36] 27 and 28 Vict., c 25, 1864. [37] 39 and 40 Vict., c 59, 1876. [38] 27 and 28 Vict., c 25, 1864. [39] Convention Relative to the Creation of an International Prize Court, Final Acts of the Second International Peace Conference, 1907, No. 12, for text see A. Pearce Higgins, The Hague Peace Conferences; Bentwich, The Declaration of London. [40] For discussion and text see Norman Bentwich, The Declaration of London; A. Pearce Higgins, The Hague Peace Conferences. [41] Bentwich, The Declaration of London, p. 35; for text of proposed bill, see ibid. p. 171. PART 2. THEORY OF DISTRIBUTION. a. Relation of state and individual. In considering the present theory of prize money distribution in England and Judicial opinion on the subject, the classification[1] adopted in summarizing the conclusion of the Grotian school of international law writers may be used. 1. The state is the only power that can prosecute war and take prize.