Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Volume III, 1863-1867Various
Science
Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Volume III, 1863-1867
Various
California Academy of Sciences -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
The _S. interlineata_ is figured in the Railroad Reports;
see vol. V, Geological Report, plate IV, fig. 30; and for
Mr. Blake’s remarks and Mr. Stimpson’s description, the same
Report, chap. XII, p. 153.
Dr. J. Blake made some remarks on specimens, presented by him, of
infusoria, found in the sand-hills, south of Point Lobos, and which form
a kind of concretions, fixing the sand in its place.
Dr. Ayres made the following remarks in relation to the genus
NOTORHYNCHUS:
This genus was defined by me in 1855 (Proc. Cal. Acad. Nat.
Sci., vol. I, p. 72) to include a species occurring in the Bay
of San Francisco. In 1858 Girard refers to the species (P. R.
R. Rep., vol. X, p. 367) under the generic name HEPTANCHUS, of
which he considers NOTORHYNCHUS a synonym. In 1861, Mr. Gill
refers it to Rafinesque’s genus HEPTRANCHIAS. (Annals of the
Lyc. Nat. Hist., N. Y., vol. VIII, Dec.) In a more recent paper
(Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phil., Oct., 1862) Mr. Gill restores my
species to the name under which it was originally described.
He says: “This generic name of NOTORHYNCHUS was proposed by
Dr. Ayres under a misapprehension.” My “misapprehension”
was that I regarded the species as the type of a new genus;
a conclusion at which Mr. Gill himself has, after several
changes, also arrived. He gives as a synonym of NOTORHYNCHUS
only “HEPTANCHUS, Sp. Müller and Henle, Gray, Girard, Gill,”
whereas it is necessary to include also “HEPTRANCHIAS, Gill,”
as above indicated.
I may remark that the description given by Mr. Gill of the
teeth of _Notorhynchus maculatus_, (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.,
Phil., Oct., 1862, p. 495) will not bear examination. It
represents the individual specimen on which it was founded; but
the species is quite common here, and I find that the number
and the forms of the teeth vary so much, that my original
description, which Mr. Gill says is “equally applicable to any
species of the family,” is fully as close as nature will allow
us to draw. I am at a loss to understand how it is possible
for him to refer the jaws of a shark, collected at a point
so far removed from us as Nisqually, to my species, when my
description is so extremely indefinite.
Professor Whitney gave an account of an interesting collection of
Japanese minerals and fossils, in the possession of J. H. Van Reed, Esq.,
of this city.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account