Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and SermonsElmslie, William Gray
Religion
Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and Sermons
Elmslie, William Gray
Elmslie, William Gray, 1848-1889; Sermons, English -- 19th century; Theologians -- Scotland -- Biography
I want to-day rather to tell you some of the qualifications of a
prophet—some of the elements of character that a man must have if he is
to play the part of a prophet to the people he lives among, bidding
myself and you take the prophets as an example. One thing is
remarkable—the office of a prophet was not hereditary. The great
departments of God's government, and teaching, and dealings with Israel
were the kingship, the priesthood, and the prophethood—the rule, the
fellowship, and the teaching and guidance. Now, all these culminated in
Jesus; He is Prophet, Priest, and King. In Israel no mere man or body of
men was fit in unity to fill those offices; they were distributed. The
burden was too great, the power was too grand, for any single man,
except the perfect Son of Man, to combine them in their fulness, and so
they were divided in Israel, to be reunited in the perfect embodiment of
Israel, God, Prophet, Priest, and King to the people. God's meaning was
that all Israel in its completeness should be king, and prophet, and
priest, without any active, separated, divided government; that it
should be a theocracy, as God's kingdom, ruling themselves, every one of
them being a king to God, every one of them being a priest, every one of
them being able to come direct to God for himself, and to bring his
prayers to God without any intervention of man; in the same way every
man, as a prophet, hearing God's voice direct to his heart, and being
taught the truth that God revealed. God wanted them all to be prophets;
God wanted them all to be priests; God wanted them all to be kings: but
they were not fit for it, and so among them special men had to be
cultivated to fill those offices. Now, there is this distinction between
those divided offices or faculties of God's rule and guidance in Israel:
the kingship was hereditary; the priesthood was hereditary: the
prophethood was never hereditary. A priest's son was born a priest; a
king's son was born a king: a prophet's son was not born a prophet. The
prophets were selected, not born. Why? Because it was the supreme and
grandest office, the most difficult, the most responsible, the most
sacred. Any man was fit to be a priest, to conduct the ritual and
external ordinances of worship, through which men's hearts were brought
to God. And any man, comparatively, might be a king, so long as he
devoted to his office that amount of thought and time which was
necessary. It needed no special moral qualifications and no special
insight. A man was the better who had these, but he could be a good
enough king without them. But a prophet could not be born a prophet; a
prophet had to be chosen, a prophet had to be made by God. And the
reason was this: the prophethood was a creative office and function.
God's dealings with Israel were not done when He had given the ancient
economy of a religious priesthood and kingdom. God had to reshape, and
remodel, and adopt His laws, and teaching, and meaning, and the outward
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account