Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and SermonsElmslie, William Gray
Religion
Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and Sermons
Elmslie, William Gray
Elmslie, William Gray, 1848-1889; Sermons, English -- 19th century; Theologians -- Scotland -- Biography
There was real danger in Christ's return to Jerusalem. He was conscious
of it, for you find that when He did make His way to Bethany He seems to
have taken care, as far as possible, to conceal the fact from the
inhabitants of Jerusalem. He came very quietly. He did not at first
enter into Bethany. He remained outside the precincts of the village. He
sent word secretly to Martha, so that not even Mary or the other persons
that were with them in the house knew of the fact. And then, again, He
sent Martha back, or Martha went back, to Mary, and, with somewhat
studied concealment, warned her of the Master's vicinity, so that when
she went out those who were with her fancied she was going to the grave.
I point all that out to you in order that you may see that it is not a
mere imagination or fancy, but that one of the great elements in
determining the conduct of the family at Bethany, and the action of
Christ, was that real hazard of His life, which He dared not needlessly
risk in perils at this time, since His time of toil on earth, His
daylight of labour, was not yet over and done.
When Jesus received the message He behaved in a seemingly strange
fashion. Apparently He just did nothing, but went on with His teaching
and preaching for two long days. Did He think how often anxious faces
would be at the door of that house in Bethany, peering along the road
that led to the home, looking for the figure that had so often trodden
that way, because His heart drew Him to that happy family circle? Did
Jesus know that Lazarus was dying? Did Jesus think that the hearts of
Mary and Martha were breaking? Oh, He had the most loving heart that
ever man had on earth, and yet He delayed two days before He set out for
that home of distress. Now, that fact is often presented in a somewhat
revolting fashion, and I think it is worth while just to diverge from my
main theme to remove the effect of such presentation if it weighs with
any of you. It is said that Jesus deliberately hung back for two days in
order to let Lazarus die. That is a mistake—a total mistake. Lazarus had
been already buried four days before Christ arrived. Now, suppose He had
lost no time; suppose He had set out at once, He would only have reached
Bethany two days earlier, and so, you see, Lazarus would have then
already been buried two days. The real fact is just this, that the
message was sent too late, and the sick man had died; and even if Christ
had gone at once, all the same He would have found him in the grave. But
none the less the story is so told as to shut us up to this conviction,
that it was planned, and purposed, and accepted in the will of God, and
in the will of Jesus, that Lazarus should be sick, and grow worse and
worse, and should sink and fail, and die and be buried. Indubitably
Jesus, with His knowledge, could, of His own action, have returned
earlier to have intervened and prevented the sickness ending fatally. He
was absent that Lazarus might die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account