Prophecies of Robert Nixon, Mother Shipton, and Martha, the Gypsy — John Shaqi
Prophecies of Robert Nixon, Mother Shipton, and Martha, the GypsyAnonymous
History
Prophecies of Robert Nixon, Mother Shipton, and Martha, the Gypsy
Anonymous
Prophecies
spoiled the harlot of her riches. They have eaten her flesh, i.e. seized
on her benefices, and revenues, which she had in their countries. This
must go on and be finished as it is begun. The Kings who yet remain
under the empire of Rome must break with her, leave her solitary and
desolate.
But who must begin this last revolt? it is most probable that France
shall. Not Spain, which as yet is plunged in superstition and is as much
under the tyranny of the clergy as ever. Not the Emperor, who in
temporal matters is subject to the Pope and permits that in his states
the Archbishop of Strigonium should teach that the Pope can take away the
Imperial crown from him. It cannot be any country but France, which a
long time ago hath begun to shake off the yoke of Rome. ’Tis well known
how solemnly and openly war hath been declared against the Pope by a
declaration of the King (ratified in all the parliaments) by the
decisions of the assembly of the French Clergy, by a disputation against
the authority of the Pope, managed in the Sorbonne, solemnly and by order
of the court. And to heighten the affront the theses were posted up even
upon the gates of his Nuncio. Nothing of this kind had hitherto happened
at least in a time of peace and unless the Pope had given occasion by his
insolence.
Besides this superstition and idolatry lose their credit much in
France.—There is a secret party, though well enough known, which greatly
despiseth the popular devotions, images, worship of saints, and is
convinced that these are human inventions: God is beforehand preparing
for his great work.
To this it may be objected that for the last hundred and fifty years the
Pope’s empire hath not been made up of ten Kings, because the Kings of
England, Sweden, Denmark, etc., have thrown off his government; and
consequently, France is not at this day the tenth part of the Babylonian
empire; for it is more than a tenth part of it. But this is no
difficulty; for we must know, that things retain the names which they
bore in their original (without regarding the alterations which time does
bring along.) Though at this day there are not ten kingdoms under the
Babylonian empire, it is, notwithstanding, certain, that each kingdom was
called, and ought to be called in this prophecy, the tenth part, because
the prophet having described this empire in its beginning, by its ten
horns, or ten kings, it is necessary for our clear understanding, that
every one of these Kings and kingdoms, should be called one of the ten
Kings, or of ten kingdoms, with respect to the original constitution of
the Antichristian empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account