Prospectus of the Scots New Zealand Land CompanyMatthew, Patrick
History
Prospectus of the Scots New Zealand Land Company
Matthew, Patrick
New Zealand -- Emigration and immigration; Scots New Zealand Land Company
Should the New Zealand Land Company of London capitalists go on
purchasing the good-will of the lands they are selling only, and not
attempt to engross or monopolize large portions of New Zealand, to the
exclusion of emigrants who will not consent to pay to them their heavy
monopoly price or tax, and if they shall employ 75 per cent. of the
price they charge for the lands in fitting out colonizing expeditions,
consisting of a proper assortment of emigrants, as they have done in
the first instance, _but which they refuse to go on doing_; or, if they
shall dispose of the lands at a price nearly equal to the government
price of the United States for fresh lands, and not take to themselves
beyond a fair interest for the capital they may lie out of, allotting
the residue for the internal improvement of the colony (roads, bridges,
&c.), and for civilizing and ameliorating the condition of the natives,
their agency in promoting New Zealand colonization may be of very great
utility, by giving confidence and security to emigrants. If this is the
line they are to pursue, the Scots Company will do every thing they may
have in their power to further the London Company’s objects, and will
no doubt be met by the London Company in the same spirit. New Zealand
will afford more than a sufficient field for the exertions of both.
FOOTNOTES:
[14] The proper means to prevent settlers from seizing upon more land
than they can put to good use, and taking up too wide an arrangement,
is not a high price upon fresh lands (which is merely to suck out
the life’s-blood of the colonist just as he is about to commence
the arduous combat), but a low land tax per acre, rated permanently
to three or more class qualities of soil. This is the only genuine
tax,--should be the only tax, and made available to the whole
government of the colony. Instead of repressing industry as other
taxes necessarily do (those on pernicious luxuries excepted), this tax
would even benefit the payer by stimulating him to improve his lands,
and thus render them of higher quality, while their class rating for
taxation remained unchanged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account