Proteus : $b or, The future of intelligenceLee, Vernon
Philosophy
Proteus : $b or, The future of intelligence
Lee, Vernon
Intellect
But here again I must forestall another wrong identification likely
to jump into the reader’s mind: to wit, of Proteus with Intelligence.
On the contrary: Proteus, multiform and ever-elusive, represents that
which Intelligence (lighter equipped than specialized Intellect for
such rapid hunts) can sometimes catch sight of and, for however brief
a contact, sometimes even clutch. Proteus, in my mythology, is the
mysterious whole which we know must exist, but know not how to descry:
Reality. For, whatever else we may believe it to be, Reality when thus
partially revealed, is never twice the same. Nor merely because of
what we call waxing and waning, growth and decay, and whatever other
phases of individual and racial transformation biology has made us
superficially familiar with. There may well be some πάντα ῤεῖ outside
and irrespective of our thoughts; indeed, it may have been in miming
the universal flux that our thoughts themselves have grown _protean_.
Look, for instance, at that strange (well named _auxiliary_) verb
whereby we testify belief in reality, _esse_, _to be_; which holds
in its emptiness the possibility of all qualities and happenings and
implies in its assertion of mere blank existence the assurance of
continual change: a future and past. For, whenever we speak of what we
call a _thing_, its mere name, like the name of Virgil’s Proteus, is
a spell making us witness aspect after aspect, take stock of relation
after relation, admit likelihood after likelihood. And our belief in
that thing’s reality, in its being _that thing_ and no other, means
that it has had a certain, however unknown; past, and will have a more
or less certain future. In this sense _Reality_, the fact of aspects
perceived, remembered and expected in regularly connected sequences and
combinations, _that_ is what I mean by Proteus. Maybe that Proteus does
not change at all except in our narrow, and shifting, field of vision.
Maybe that the multiform Virgilian Proteus might turn out to undergo
but one first and last transformation, into that great auxiliary
_esse_, _to be_, holding in its stark emptiness all that, for us, is
things and happenings.... Such a transcendent and sole real Reality I
leave to metaphysicians, not without wondering secretly whence, save
from occasional experience of this (to them) unreal Proteus, they ever
got to think about Reality at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account