A comparison imposes itself with certain obsessive fears or cravings
bearing upon one object which, to any one but the person experiencing
such fears or cravings, may appear anything but fearful or desirable.
The psychoanalytic investigation of the origin of such obsessions
always shows that they can be traced back to childhood impressions
which have modified our nervous reactions to certain objects or ideas.
=The Meaning of Choice.= Applied psychology and laboratory
research have in recent years attached a more and more deterministic
connotation to the term "choice." The word, which to academic
psychologists, implied the exercise of free will and "judgment," will
have some day to be accepted as synonymous with "compulsion."
A few examples from animal behavior will illustrate my meaning.
Philosophers have for years wasted breath and ink on the academic
consideration of the following puzzle:
A donkey is standing at equal distance from two bales of hay; the
two masses of fodder are mathematically alike in size, shape, color,
fragrance, quality, etc.
Unless the animal, certain philosophers said, was able to "make a
choice" of his own, he would remain motionless between the two bales
whose attraction would be perfectly balanced. He would, like some
celestial bodies, be held suspended by two forces which would not allow
him to turn to the right nor to the left. He would rationally have to
starve if attraction were a force exerting itself from the outside
exclusively.
Yet no donkey placed in such a situation will fail to make an immediate
choice. He will turn to one of the bales and start eating it.
Even if we imagine a philosophising donkey reasoning as follows:
"The two bales are equally attractive. Hence it makes no difference
which one I start with. Let us begin with either."
Even then, he will have to "make a choice," altho his selection of one
of the bales seems to be due entirely to "chance."
=Chance in the Discard.= Psychological research has eliminated
chance as a factor in human behavior, and whether our donkey starts
with the right or with the left bale, an analyst will insist that there
are reasons why he picks out that one bale to be eaten first.
Laboratory dogs which have supplied solutions for so many psychological
difficulties, have proved of service in this case too.
If the slightest surgical operation has been performed on one side of a
dog's brain, he becomes unable to move in a straight line.
He deviates from the straight line toward the side on which his brain
has been injured. If the lesion is on the right side he will be
compelled to turn to the right and vice versa. This is due to the fact
that the injury has weakened that side and the cerebral dynamo which
supplies the body with power produces less current on the injured than
on the uninjured side.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account