As far as the mates themselves are concerned, free love will only be a
success in the case of extremely normal individuals for whom the sexual
relationship means solely physical gratification. As soon as affection
intervenes in those unions, the thousand forms of jealousy we shall
describe in another chapter will enter into play.
Jealousy among free lovers cannot but rage more fiercely than among the
legally married. A thousand details of married life are simply meant to
establish the mates' ownership of each other in their own eyes and in
the eyes of the world. The number of war marriages contracted hastily
during the great European conflict by young men and women on the eve
of the bridegroom's departure for Europe testifies to the powerful
"safety" symbolism of the marriage ceremony.
A gullible young man in love with a girl would not have trusted her
alone during his absence from home. She might have experienced a change
of heart. After going thru a wedding ceremony with him, however, he
_knew_ that she could not change her mind and love another. As a matter
of fact most of those unions were disastrous. A virgin might have
waited. A young woman left alone after a few days of erotic enjoyment
was naturally an easy prey for any clever tempter. The bridegroom,
on the other hand, went away blissfully, secure in the thought
that the marriage certificate, the ceremony, the wedding ring, the
transformation of Mary Brown into Mrs. John Smith would protect his
"honor" while he was away.
=Blissful Blindness.= Some of the cleverest, most cynically suspicious
husbands and wives go thru life blissfully blind to their mate's
sidesteps. They see thru anyone else's husband or wife but they seldom
suspect _their_ husband or _their_ wife. The stress which they place on
the possessive works in their case as the fetish which a savage takes
into battle. In hoc signo vinces.
It is only in the so called smart set that men and women allude to
their mates by their first names. The working classes, sexually the
most conservative and puritanical, use the expressions "my man" or "the
missus"; middle class men and women pompously refer to their mates
as Mr. Smith or Mrs. Smith, always reminding their hearers of the
legitimacy of their union. The celebration of wooden weddings, silver
weddings, etc., is a means of reminding the community that Mr. and
Mrs. John Smith _own_ each other, just as the engagement diamond is a
scarecrow proportionate in visibility to the prospective bridegroom's
fortune.
Even if free love unions became the adopted standard of the land, those
unions would be celebrated with appropriate ritual, the aim of which
would be to tie the man to the woman and the woman to the man and to
warn away sexual hunters of both sexes.
Free love will not be possible until the absolute equality of men and
women has been accepted, not only theoretically but practically.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account