Psychology : $b A study of mental lifeWoodworth, Robert Sessions
Science
Psychology : $b A study of mental life
Woodworth, Robert Sessions
Psychology
The mobility of attention must mean that brain activities are in
constant flux, with nerve currents continually shooting hither and
thither and arousing ever fresh groups of neurones; but sustained
attention means that a brain {269} activity (representing the desire
or interest or reaction-tendency dominant at the time) may persist and
limit the range of the mobile activities, by facilitating some of
these and inhibiting others.
The "focusing" of mental activity is more difficult to translate into
neural terms. The fact to be translated is that, while several mental
activities may go on at once, only one occupies the focus of
attention. This must mean that, while several brain activities go on
at once, one is superior in some way to the rest. The superiority
might lie in greater intensity of neurone action, or in greater
extent; that is, one brain activity is bigger in some way than any
other occurring at the same time--bigger either because the neurones
in it are working more energetically or because it includes a larger
number of active neurones.
But why should not two equally big brain activities sometimes occur at
the same moment, and attention thus be divided? The only promising
hypothesis that has been offered to explain the absence of divided
attention is that of "neurone drainage", according to which one or the
other of two neurone groups, simultaneously aroused to activity,
drains off the energy from the other, so putting a quietus on it.
Unfortunately, this hypothesis explains too much, for it would make it
impossible for minor brain activities to go on at the same time as the
major one, and that would mean that only one thing could be done at a
time, and that the field of consciousness was no broader than the
field of attention. On the whole, we must admit that we do not know
exactly what the focusing of attention can mean in brain terms.
{270}
EXERCISES
1. Outline the chapter, in the form of a number of "laws", putting
under each law the chief facts that belong there.
2. See if you can verify, by watching another person's eyes, the
statements made on page 250 regarding eye movements.
3. Choose a spot where there is a good deal going on, stay there
for five minutes and jot down the things that attract your
attention. Classify the stimuli under the several "factors of
advantage".
4. Mention some stimulus to which you have a habit of attention,
and one to which you have a habit of inattention.
5. Close the eyes, and direct attention to the field of cutaneous
and kinesthetic sensations. Do sensations emerge of which you are
ordinarily only dimly conscious? Does shifting occur?
6. Of the several factors of advantage, which would be most effective
in catching another person's attention, and which in holding his
attention?
7. How does attention, in a blind person, probably differ from that
of a seeing person?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account