Psychopathia sexualis: With especial reference to contrary sexual instinct: A medico-legal study — John Shaqi
Psychopathia sexualis: With especial reference to contrary sexual instinct: A medico-legal studyKrafft-Ebing, R. von (Richard)
Science
Psychopathia sexualis: With especial reference to contrary sexual instinct: A medico-legal study
Krafft-Ebing, R. von (Richard)
Paraphilias
PSYCHOPATHIA SEXUALIS,
WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO
Contrary Sexual Instinct:
A MEDICO-LEGAL STUDY.
By Dr. R. von KRAFFT-EBING,
Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Vienna.
AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION
OF THE
SEVENTH ENLARGED AND REVISED GERMAN EDITION,
BY
CHARLES GILBERT CHADDOCK, M.D.,
Professor of Nervous and Mental Diseases, Marion-Sims College of
Medicine, St. Louis; Fellow of the Chicago Academy of Medicine;
Corresponding Member of the Detroit Academy of Medicine; Associate
Member of the American Medico-Psychological Association, etc.
[Illustration]
PHILADELPHIA AND LONDON:
THE F. A. DAVIS CO., PUBLISHERS.
1893.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1892, by
THE F. A. DAVIS COMPANY,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C., U. S.
A.
All rights reserved.
Philadelphia, Pa., U. S. A.:
The Medical Bulletin Printing House,
1916 Cherry Street.
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION.
Very few ever fully appreciate the powerful influence which sexuality
exercises over feeling, thought, and conduct, both in the individual and
in society. Schiller, in his poem, “Die Weltweisen,” recognizes it with
the words:—
“Einstweilen bis den Bau der Welt
Philosophie zusammenhält,
Erhält sie das Getriebe
Durch Hunger und durch Liebe.”[1]
It is remarkable that the sexual life has received but a very
subordinate consideration on the part of philosophers.
Schopenhauer (“The World as Will and Idea”) thought it strange that love
had been thus far a subject for the poet alone, and that, with the
exception of superficial treatment by Plato, Rousseau, and Kant, it had
been foreign to philosophers.
What Schopenhauer and, after him, the Philosopher of the Unconscious, E.
v. Hartmann, philosophized concerning the sexual relations is so
imperfect, and in its consequences so distasteful, that, aside from the
treatment in the works of Michelet (“L’amour”) and Mantegazza
(“Physiology of Love”), which are to be considered more as brilliant
discussions than as scientific treatises, the empirical psychology and
metaphysics of the sexual side of human existence rest upon a foundation
which is scientifically almost puerile.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account