The study of the effect of individual pathology on culture, and of culture upon individual pathology, is envisaged as a program in the following: Birnbaum, Karl. _Grundzüge der Kulturpsychopathologie_, “Grenzfragen des Nerven- und Seelenlebens,” Heft 116. Munich, 1924. The reckless extension of individual pathological terms to the state of society as a whole has caused much confusion, but a case can be made out for a valid use of the concept of the pathological. Thus: Schneersohn, F. “Zur Grundlegung einer Völker- und Massenpsychopathologie (Soziopsychopathologie),” _Ethos_, I (1925-26), 81-120. This includes an exhaustive bibliography of the efforts of psychiatrists to extend their conceptions to society, and a detailed consideration of the methodological issues involved. Special attention should be called to the forthcoming volume by Harry Stack Sullivan on _Personal Psychopathology_ in which a systematic treatment of the whole field of psychiatry and sociology is presented. Dr. Sullivan has vastly stimulated a _rapprochement_ between physician and social scientist in the United States. See the _Proceedings_ of the two colloquiums on personality investigation, held under the auspices of the American Psychiatric Association, first published in the _American Journal of Psychiatry_ for May, 1929, and May, 1930, and separately obtainable. APPENDIX B QUESTION LIST ON POLITICAL PRACTICES This question list refers directly to the organized political life of the subject. Questions which are designed to elicit preferences are not included. For general personality questions and trait lists, the usual sources may be consulted for suggestions.[85] The question list here must, of course, be modified if used orally or with naïve subjects. An effort is always to be made to elicit specific incidents which arise in the mind. “Reminiscences” and not theories about the self are desired. 1. List the various associations and organizations of which you have been a member and in which you enjoyed rights which were approximately equal to those exercised by everyone else. Specify in each case whether you were almost inactive, moderately active, quite active. State when you became a member and how your subsequent activity fluctuated. Give dates when possible. Remember that you have been a member of various democratically organized political units. Mention also the prep-school class organizations, school and college organizations, alumni associations, profession organizations, civic associations, parties, and elective public offices. Organizations which were autocratically organized (that is, which exercised authority over those who had no formal right to choose the officials) should not be included. Do not omit associations of war veterans, Daughters or Sons of the Revolution, pacifists, anarchists, reform agitators, constitutional defense leagues, etc.