Public School Life: Boys, Parents, MastersWaugh, Alec
History
Public School Life: Boys, Parents, Masters
Waugh, Alec
Education, Secondary; Endowed public schools (Great Britain)
_Soc._: Very good: then we have established that it is fair for a boy to
come to his study after breakfast, find in his hand a written
translation of his Virgil, and, with that written translation, prepare
in twenty minutes his morning's lesson.
_Mr. F._: It would seem so, Socrates.
_Soc._: If, however, he were to take from his drawer a printed
translation of Virgil, and with that prepare his morning's lesson, you
would consider him capable of dishonest behaviour and you would report
him to the head master.
_Mr. F._: Most certainly, Socrates.
_Soc._: In what, then, lies the essential difference between the printed
translation and the one that was copied out for him by his companion?
_Mr. F._: But that is surely obvious.
_Soc._: It is not to me, and it is for this reason that I seek
enlightenment of you. For to me it seems that the work produced in form
by the boy who has studied the printed translation is every bit as much
the result of solitary and unaided labour as that which is informed by
the study of a written translation. But is it that you appreciate a
difference between the written and the printed word?
_Mr. F._: Perhaps that is it, Socrates.
_Soc._: Then would you allow a boy during the holidays to copy out one
of Dr. Giles's aids to the classics?
_Mr. F._: Most certainly not.
_Soc._: Then it is not between the written and the printed word that the
difference lies?
_Mr. F._: It would seem not.
_Soc._: Then where does it lie?
_Mr. F._: I do not know, Socrates.
_Soc._: Then we must surely assume that there is no difference; and we
must further add that you have not dealt honestly with your form in so
severely punishing them for conduct that you, yourself, are not able
logically to condemn.
_Mr. F._: As ever, Socrates, you have succeeded in making me say what I
did not mean to say.
_Soc._: Then, in order that you may extricate yourself, let us consider
this question of the prose.
_Mr. F._: Certainly. For, here at least, my position is impregnable.
_Soc._: I, too, am certain of it, and, in order that I may know the true
nature of the offence, you will, I hope, permit me to ask you certain
questions. You say that the more stupid members of your form are in the
habit of copying the exercises of their more clever comrades?
_Mr. F._: That is so.
_Soc._: Now is it a rule that a boy may not give another assistance in
his Latin prose?
_Mr. F._: Certainly.
_Soc._: The position is not the same as that of the Latin translation,
where two boys were permitted to co-operate?
_Mr. F._: Certainly not.
_Soc._: I presume that you have explained to your form the essential
difference that exists between the nature of Latin 'con' and Latin
prose.
_Mr. F._: How do you mean, Socrates?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account