Publications of the Mississippi Historical Society, Volume 01 (of 14), 1898Mississippi Historical Society
History
Publications of the Mississippi Historical Society, Volume 01 (of 14), 1898
Mississippi Historical Society
Mississippi -- History
"The navigation of the said (Mississippi) River, in its whole
breadth from its source to the ocean shall be free only to his
(Catholic Majesty) subjects and the citizens of the United
States, unless he should extend this privilege to the subjects
of other Powers by special convention."
"The two high contracting parties shall____maintain peace
and harmony among the several Indian nations who inhabit the
country adjacent to____the boundaries of the two Floridas." "No
treaty of alliance or other whatever (except treaties of peace)
shall be made by either party with the Indians living within
the boundary of the other."
These terms, so favorable to the United States and so destructive
of Spanish interests, had long been the rock upon which all plans
for an adjustment of the differences between the two powers had
been stranded.[2] Nor were they finally extorted from Spain until a
concurrence of unfavorable events had precipitated a diplomatic crisis.
Even then his Catholic Majesty seemed to consider such stipulations
as only a temporary expedient, the fulfillment of which he hoped
eventually to be able to evade. The Prince of Peace himself admits
that political circumstances forced Spain to consent to the treaty and
intimates further that he would have made even greater concessions
if they had been demanded by the United States. In writing of these
negotiations, he says:
"I had taken to heart the treaty (Jay's), which unknown to us
the English cabinet had negotiated with the United States of
America; this treaty afforded great latitude to evil designs;
it was possible to injure Spain in an indirect manner and
without risk, in her distant possessions.
"I endeavored to conclude another treaty with the same states,
and had the satisfaction to succeed in my object; _I obtained
unexpected advantages_, and met with sympathy, loyalty, and
generous sentiments in that nation of Republicans."
Subsequent events proved, however, that Godoy had overestimated the
probabilities of a consolidation of interests between the United
States and Great Britain, and that Spain had also failed to gain
that ascendency over the affairs of this "nation of republicans,"
which she hoped to do through this treaty.[3] She was therefore no
longer interested in fulfilling its stipulations. These facts are
substantiated by a letter which Stoddard[4] claims was written by
Governor Gayoso in June, 1796, to a confidential friend, and which came
to light several years afterward. In this communication Gayoso claims
that:
"The object of Great Britain in her treaty with the United
States about this period, was to attach them to her interests,
and even render them dependent on her, and, therefore, the
Spanish treaty of limits was made to counterbalance it; but as
Great Britain had totally failed in her object it was not the
policy of Spain to regard her stipulations."[5]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account