Punch or the London Charivari, Vol.107, September 1, 1894Various
General
Punch or the London Charivari, Vol.107, September 1, 1894
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI.
VOL. 107.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1894.
[Illustration: "CONTRIBUTIONS THANKFULLY RECEIVED."
_Lardy-Dardy Swell (who is uncertain as to the age of Ingénue he is
addressing)._ "YOU'RE GOING TO GIVE A BALL. WILL YOU PERMIT ME TO SEND
YOU A BOUQUET? AND IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE?"
_Ingénue._ "O, THANKS! THE BOUQUET WOULD BE _DELIGHTFUL_!
AND"--(_hesitating, then after some consideration_)--"I'M SURE MAMMA
WOULD LIKE THE ICES AND SPONGE CAKES!"]
* * * * *
THE TALE OF TWO TELEGRAMS.
ANOTHER DOLLY DIALOGUE.
(_By St. Anthony Hope Carter._)
The redeeming feature of the morning batch of letters was a short note
from Lady MICKLEHAM. Her ladyship (and ARCHIE) had come back to town,
and the note was to say that I might call, in fact that I _was_ to call,
that afternoon. It so happened that I had two engagements, which seemed
to make that impossible, but I spent a shilling in telegrams, and at
4.30 (the hour DOLLY had named) was duly ringing at the Mickleham town
mansion.
"I'm delighted you were able to come," was DOLLY'S greeting.
"I wasn't able," I said; "but I've no doubt that what I said in the two
telegrams which brought me here will be put down to your account."
"No one expects truth in a telegram. The Post-Office people themselves
wouldn't like it."
DOLLY was certainly looking at her very best. Her dimples (everybody has
heard of DOLLY'S Dimples--or is it DOLLY DIMPLE; but after all it
doesn't matter) were as delightful as ever. I was just hesitating as to
my next move in the Dialogue, which I badly wanted, for I had promised
my editor one by the middle of next week. The choice lay between the
dimples and a remark that life was, after all, only one prolonged
telegram. Just at that moment I noticed for the first time that we were
not alone.
Now that was distinctly exasperating, and an unwarrantable
breach of an implied contract.
"Two's company," I said, in a tone of voice that was meant to
indicate something of what I felt.
"So's three," said DOLLY, laughing, "if the third doesn't count."
"_Quod est demonstrandum._"
"Well, it's like this. I observed that you've already published
twenty or so 'Dolly Dialogues.'" (The dimples at this period were
absolutely bewitching, but I controlled myself.) "So it occurred to
me that it was my turn to earn an honest penny. Allow me to
introduce you. Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARTER--Mr. CARTER, Mr. BROWN."
I murmured that any friend of Lady MICKLEHAM'S was a friend of mine,
whereat Mr. BROWN smiled affably and handed me his card, from which I
gathered that he was a shorthand writer at some address in Chancery
Lane. Then I understood it all. I had exploited DOLLY. DOLLY was now
engaged in the process of exploiting me.
"I hope," I observed rather icily, "that you will choose a respectable
paper."
"You don't mean that."
"Perhaps not. But if we are to have a Dialogue, perhaps we might begin.
I have an engagement at six."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account