Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 108, May 18th, 1895 — John Shaqi
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 108, May 18th, 1895Various
General
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 108, May 18th, 1895
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
_Second Gossip._ "NIVVER AS MUCH AS INSIDE T'HOUSE. BUT NOBBUT WAIT
TILL _WE_ HEV' A FUNERAL OF US OWN, AN' _WE_'LL SHOW 'EM!"]
* * * * *
A-DRESS BY MR. SPEAKER.
["Certain Members object to attending the SPEAKER'S dinner or
_levées_ in full dress."]
_Mr. Speaker._
"Oh, ye must walk in silk attire,
And swords and buckles wear,
Gin ye wad come to dine wi' me,
Or tend my _levées_ mair."
_The Members._
"Oh, what's to us your silken show,
And swords and buckles smart?--
And if you still insist upon 't,
Then you and we must part!"
_Mr. Speaker._
"Then ye shall come in what attire
It suits ye best to wear,
Gin ye 'll consent to mind the Whip,
Nor plague the Party mair."
* * * * *
WORTHY OBJECT.--It is encouraging to hear of a "_Mission to Deep Sea
Fishermen_." The deeper the sea-fishermen are, the more necessary is
the mission. These Deep Sea-Fishermen are generally supposed to be
able to look after their own soles; but now they will receive aid in
their work. As the Bishop of LIVERPOOL is a prominent patron of this
good work, it may be taken for granted that most of these deep 'uns
are fishermen in his Lordship's See.
* * * * *
AN ACQUITTAL.--With what a sense of relief does a _bon vivant_ who has
been brought up by Corporal AILMENT before the Doctor's Court Martial
hear the verdict of "Not Gouty!"
* * * * *
LAW IN BLANK.
(_A Natural Development of the Modern System of Suppression._)
SCENE--_Interior of one of the Royal Courts. Customary
occupants and surroundings._ Witness _in the box undergoing
cross-examination_.
_First Counsel._ And now will you give me the name of the person you
met on that occasion?
_Second Counsel._ I do not wish to interfere without reason; but
surely it is unnecessary to introduce third parties into this inquiry.
_Witness._ Perhaps I might follow the plan I adopted in my
examination-in-chief and write the name on a piece of paper?
_The Judge._ That seems a reasonable course to pursue.
_First Counsel._ As your Lordship pleases. Then be so good as to give
me the name as suggested. (Witness _complies_.) Thank you. (_After
reading the paper._) Do you spell the name with a final "e"?
_Second Counsel._ Really, my learned friend is carrying matters too
far. If the anonymity of third parties is to be preserved, such a
leading question would reveal the identity at once.
_The Judge._ I suppose you mean that the query about the final "e"
would indicate that the veiled name was "BROWNE."
_Second Counsel._ Quite so, my lord; that is a conclusion that would
be accepted by persons of the most ordinary intelligence.
_First Counsel._ But as a matter of fact, the name to which I refer
is certainly neither BROWN nor BROWNE. I will submit the paper to your
lordship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account