Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-02-25 — John Shaqi
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-02-25Various
General
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-02-25
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
Irish _Judy_, a charmingly pretty busybody, outwardly just like Miss IRIS
HOEY, comes to _Peter Keppel's_ studio and hears that this casual youth has
got into a deplorable habit of putting off his marriage with her friend
_Milly_. She (_Judy_) will see to that! She assumes the _role_ of a
notorious Chelsea model, whom proper _Peter_ has never seen. _Peter_ knocks
his head on the mantelpiece, just where a shrapnel splinter had hit him,
and is persuaded that she, _Judy McCarthy_, affecting to be _Trixie
O'Farrel_, is his wife. It all seems very horrible to him, but, shell-shock
or no shell-shock, he sets to work to paint her portrait in a business-like
way, and at the end of four hours it doesn't seem at all horrible. And by
the time it is explained that it was all a joke (some people do have such a
nice sense of humour) he is all for rushing off to the registry-office,
_Judy_ agreeing.
Not that _Judy_ is a minx. She did her level best to make two people who
obviously didn't love one another fulfil their engagement, instead of, like
a sensible woman, accepting the inevitable, which was, as it happens, so
congenial to her. What puzzled me was _Peter's_ indignation with poor
_Milly_ when he found that she really didn't love him (but, on the
contrary, a bounder called _Crauford_), yet couldn't bear to cause him
unhappiness, and was sacrificing herself for him. As that was his attitude
precisely, I suppose he felt annoyed by this lack of originality. If we men
are like that, it wasn't nice of Mr. DENNY to give us away.
At any rate I am sure Mr. DONALD CALTHROP didn't believe in _Peter_ all the
time. When he did he was very good indeed. When he didn't he was horrid.
Did Miss IRIS HOEY believe in _Judy_? I am not so sure. I suspect not. Did
I believe in either? I did not.
I was a little surprised that Miss JOAN VIVIAN-REES should so overplay her
_Trixie_. Her work is certainly in general not like that, and I conjecture
the influence of some baleful autocrat of a producer. It seemed to me that
Miss MILDRED EVELYN'S _Milly_ was, all things considered, a capable and
consistent study of a desperately unsympathetic character, a more difficult
and creditable feat than is commonly supposed.
T.
"WILD GEESE."
[Illustration: _Mr. JACK BUCHANAN_ (_Hon. Bill Malcolm_). "WHAT'S THE IDEA?
ARE YOU BY ANY CHANCE TRYING TO GIVE ME THE COLD SHOULDER?"
_Miss PHYLLIS MONKMAN_ (_Violet Braid_). "NO. I JUST KEEP ON DOING THIS FOR
THE LOOK OF THE THING."]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account