Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-06-30Various
General
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-06-30
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
The phenomenal success of our recent volumes has, I understand, led a
certain section of our public to believe that you are the author of several
of my books. In particular it has been stated that _The Rosary_ was written
by your Lordship. As you know, I have a great respect for the aristocracy,
and I do not suggest that you have deliberately put yourself forward as the
author of my books. You will, however, understand me when I say that only
your Lordship could express all that I feel about the matter. The mixing up
of our identities is probably explained by the fact that we are both
stylists and seekers for the _mot juste_. Will you please assist me in
making it clear that we work independently? As I am staying in a country
parsonage and it is our custom to read one another's letters over the
breakfast-table, I shall be glad if any reply you may wish to make should
be sent to the Editor of _The Times_.
_Sir ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE to Sir OLIVER LODGE._
Our common concern with the life beyond has become so well known that our
interests in this present life are in danger of becoming involved. In a
volume of _Sherlock Holmes_ stories recently purchased abroad I find you
described as the author, and another book assures me that I have written
extensively on the Atomic Theory. You will, I am sure, see the harm which I
am likely to suffer through such mistakes. Nor does the confusion end here.
I find that my novel, _The Hound of the Baskervilles_, is now stated to be
by Sir CONAN LODGE, and another book of mine, _The Lost World_, to be by
Sir OLIVER DOYLE. Also I have seen myself described as "The Principal of
Birmingham University," and yourself as the well-known detective of Baker
Street. May I solicit your aid in helping me to suppress any further
confusion of our respective genii? My best wishes to you and the good work.
* * * * *
LABOUR-SAVING.
["Electric bore, one man, portable."--_Trade Journal_.]
Though not a scientific bean
I am occasionally seen
Scanning a technic magazine.
I love to learn of any wheeze
Wherewith to win by quick degrees
A rich sufficiency of ease.
And so it thrilled me to the core
To read the phrase, "Electric bore,"
And think of happy days in store.
In former times I'd often start
Abroad with eagerness of heart
To patronise dramatic art;
Only at curtain's fall to come
Homeward again, dejected, glum,
And overwhelmed by tedium.
With _ennui_ verging on distress
I'd witnessed from the circle (dress)
Some transatlantic HUGE SUCCESS;
Or else some play of Irish life,
Ending with father, son and wife
Impaled upon a single knife;
Or haply I had chanced to choose
Some even surer source of blues,
One of the things they call revues.
But now those times are passed away;
Electric bores have come to stay;
I mean to purchase one to-day.
I don't know how it works, but an
Authority declares it can
Be guided by a single man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account