Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Sources; Great Britain -- History -- Early Stuarts, 1603-1649 -- Sources
And it is further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That no Goods
or Commodities that are of Forein Growth, Production or Manufacture,
and which are to be brought into this Commonwealth, in Shipping
belonging to the People thereof, shall be by them Shipped or brought
from any other place or places, Countrey or Countreys, but onely
from those of their said Growth, Production or Manufacture; or from
those Ports where the said Goods and Commodities can onely, or are,
or usually have been first shipped for Transportation; and from none
other Places or Countreys, under the same penalty of forfeiture and
loss expressed in the first Branch of this Act, the said Forfeitures
to be recovered and employed as is therein expressed.
HOBBES ON LIBERTY (1651).
=Source.=--Hobbes, _Leviathan_, 1651. P. 108.
But as men, for the attaining of peace, and conservation of
themselves thereby, have made an Artificial Man, which we call a
Common-wealth; so also have they made Artificial Chains, called civil
laws, which they themselves, by mutual covenants, have fastened at
one end, to the lips of that man, or assembly, to whom they have
given the sovereign power; and at the other end to their own ears.
These Bonds, in their own nature but weak, may neverthelesse be made
to hold, by the danger, though not by the difficulty, of breaking
them.
In relation to these Bonds only it is, that I am to speak now, of the
_Liberty_ of _Subjects_. For seeing there is no Common-wealth in the
world, wherein there be rules enough set down, for the regulating of
all the actions, and words of men, (as being a thing impossible:)
it followeth necessarily, that in all kinds of actions, by the laws
prætermitted, men have the Liberty of doing what their own reasons
shall suggest, for the most profitable to themselves. For if we take
Liberty in the proper sense, for corporal Liberty; that is to say,
freedom from chains and prison, it were very absurd for men to clamor
as they do, for the Liberty they so manifestly enjoy. Again, if we
take Liberty for an exemption from Laws, it is no less absurd for men
to demand, as they do, that Liberty, by which all other men may be
masters of their lives. And yet as absurd as it is, this is it they
demand; not knowing that the laws are of no power to protect them,
without a sword in the hands of a man, or men, to cause those laws to
be put in execution. The Liberty of a Subject lieth therefore only in
those things which, in regulating their actions, the Sovereign hath
prætermitted: such as is the Liberty to buy, and sell, and otherwise
contract with one another; to choose their own abode, their own
diet, their own trade of life, and institute their children as they
themselves think fit; and the like.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account